|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 12, 2017 12:16:25 GMT -5
Barrett is putting together an outstanding season while leading Ohio State’s offense to 2014-like numbers.
•He has a 19-to-1 touchdown pass to interception ratio, which is second-best in the nation while his 19 TD passes rank third; •He is first in the Big Ten and 21st nationally with 304.0 total offensive yards per game. •His 166.03 passing efficiency ranks 10th.
Barrett hasn’t seen the field in the fourth quarter in three consecutive games, yet has the Buckeye offense playing well with four consecutive games of 500-or-more yards of offense – ties the school record set first in 1997 and tied in 2014 – and three consecutive games of 50-or-more points, which is one off the school record set in 2014.
Note: Ohio State has 2,462 yards of offense in the last four games, the most ever over a four-game span for the program. The 2014 team had 2,456 yards during its four-game romp of 500-plus yard games.
|
|
|
Post by galion on Oct 12, 2017 12:38:52 GMT -5
Outside of OKL the teams we played are hot garbage. Hell Galion set all sorts of offensive records in the NCC but we didn't win any post season games did we?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2017 14:46:50 GMT -5
Barrett is putting together an outstanding season while leading Ohio State’s offense to 2014-like numbers. •He has a 19-to-1 touchdown pass to interception ratio, which is second-best in the nation while his 19 TD passes rank third; •He is first in the Big Ten and 21st nationally with 304.0 total offensive yards per game. •His 166.03 passing efficiency ranks 10th. Barrett hasn’t seen the field in the fourth quarter in three consecutive games, yet has the Buckeye offense playing well with four consecutive games of 500-or-more yards of offense – ties the school record set first in 1997 and tied in 2014 – and three consecutive games of 50-or-more points, which is one off the school record set in 2014. Note: Ohio State has 2,462 yards of offense in the last four games, the most ever over a four-game span for the program. The 2014 team had 2,456 yards during its four-game romp of 500-plus yard games. How does he have a 19-1 TD to INT ratio when he has only thrown 16 TDs? As galion indicated, stats can be twisted to favor what you want. But inviting TDs to do it seems to be a bit much.
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 12, 2017 16:36:13 GMT -5
Barrett is putting together an outstanding season while leading Ohio State’s offense to 2014-like numbers. •He has a 19-to-1 touchdown pass to interception ratio, which is second-best in the nation while his 19 TD passes rank third; •He is first in the Big Ten and 21st nationally with 304.0 total offensive yards per game. •His 166.03 passing efficiency ranks 10th. Barrett hasn’t seen the field in the fourth quarter in three consecutive games, yet has the Buckeye offense playing well with four consecutive games of 500-or-more yards of offense – ties the school record set first in 1997 and tied in 2014 – and three consecutive games of 50-or-more points, which is one off the school record set in 2014. Note: Ohio State has 2,462 yards of offense in the last four games, the most ever over a four-game span for the program. The 2014 team had 2,456 yards during its four-game romp of 500-plus yard games. How does he have a 19-1 TD to INT ratio when he has only thrown 16 TDs? As galion indicated, stats can be twisted to favor what you want. But inviting TDs to do it seems to be a bit much. I was going by this comparative stat composite (below) of the leading candidates for the Johnny Unitas Golden Arm Award. However, I looked up the official stats on ESPN and he indeed has 16 TD's, so as you accurately pointed out, he has a 16-1 TD to INT. ratio. Week Six Stats: PLAYER GAMES COMP ATT % YD TD INT RUSH SCORE (record) NOTES J.T. Barrett, Ohio State 6 111 174 64% 1,513 19 1 311 W 62-14 Maryland (5-1) Next: @ Nebraska David Blough, Purdue 5 62 90 69% 688 8 4 33 W 31-17 Minnesota (3-2) Next: @ Wisconsin Jesse Ertz, Kansas St. 5 55 100 55% 930 10 3 336 L 40-34 Texas (3-2) Next: TCU Luke Falk, Washington State 6 188 262 72% 2,000 19 2 -73 W 33-10 Oregon (6-0) Next: @ Cal Riley Ferguson, Memphis 5 116 196 59% 1,535 20 5 -3 W 70-31 UConn (4-1) Next: Navy Ryan Finley, NC State 6 158 223 71% 1,770 11 0 70 W 39-25 Louisville (5-1) Next: @ Pitt Nick Fitzgerald, Mississippi St. 5 70 132 53% 783 13 5 343 Bye week (3-2) Next: BYU Quinton Flowers, South Florida 5 63 119 53% 934 15 2 395 Bye week (5-0) Next: Cincinnati Justice Hansen, Arkansas St. 4 98 151 65% 1,301 14 6 31 W 43-25 Georgia Southern (2-2) Next: Coastal Carolina Kenny Hill, TCU 5 100 145 69% 1,153 12 3 89 W 31-24 West Virginia (5-0) Next: @ Kansas State Stephen Johnson, Kentucky 6 99 155 64% 1,238 11 2 144 W 40-34 Missouri (5-1) Next: @ Mississippi State 10/21 Baker Mayfield, Oklahoma 5 100 134 75% 1,635 16 0 74 L 38-31 Iowa State (4-1) Next: Texas Trace McSorley, Penn St. 6 130 194 67% 1,597 17 4 178 W 31-7 Northwestern (6-0) Next: Michigan 10/21 Josh Rosen, UCLA 5 159 245 65% 2,135 18 5 23 Bye week (3-2) Next: @ Arizona Mason Rudolph, Oklahoma St. 5 117 173 68% 1,909 21 4 60 Bye week (4-1) Next: Baylor Brandon Silvers, Troy 5 118 182 65% 1,241 4 2 21 Bye week (4-1) Next: South Alabama Nick Stevens, Colorado St. 6 136 217 63% 1,871 15 6 75 W 27-14 Utah State (4-2) Next: Nevada Clayton Thorson, Northwestern 5 110 178 62% 1,203 7 7 -66 L 31-7 Penn State (2-3) Next: @ Maryland Mike White, Western Ky. 5 125 190 66% 1,255 6 3 -63 W 15-14 UTEP (3-2) Next: Charlotte Logan Woodside, Toledo 5 111 173 64% 1,635 11 1 -6 W 20-15 Eastern Michigan (4-1) Next: @ Central Michigan
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2017 4:48:08 GMT -5
The entire roster has thrown for 19 TDs. Once again, JT getting some credit for the work of others.
|
|
|
Post by DrTorch on Oct 13, 2017 6:55:40 GMT -5
our last 4 games were Army, UNLV, Rutgers and Maryland
i'm more interested in stats vs top-10 teams, not teams Fillmore could throw 15 tds against
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Oct 13, 2017 14:22:16 GMT -5
Barrett is putting together an outstanding season while leading Ohio State’s offense to 2014-like numbers. •He has a 19-to-1 touchdown pass to interception ratio, which is second-best in the nation while his 19 TD passes rank third; •He is first in the Big Ten and 21st nationally with 304.0 total offensive yards per game. •His 166.03 passing efficiency ranks 10th. Barrett hasn’t seen the field in the fourth quarter in three consecutive games, yet has the Buckeye offense playing well with four consecutive games of 500-or-more yards of offense – ties the school record set first in 1997 and tied in 2014 – and three consecutive games of 50-or-more points, which is one off the school record set in 2014. Note: Ohio State has 2,462 yards of offense in the last four games, the most ever over a four-game span for the program. The 2014 team had 2,456 yards during its four-game romp of 500-plus yard games. How does he have a 19-1 TD to INT ratio when he has only thrown 16 TDs? As galion indicated, stats can be twisted to favor what you want. But inviting TDs to do it seems to be a bit much. Was Ohio State the only school on that list that had the TDs for all of the school's QBs, not just the starter?
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Oct 13, 2017 14:24:01 GMT -5
our last 4 games were Army, UNLV, Rutgers and Maryland i'm more interested in stats vs top-10 teams, not teams Fillmore could throw 15 tds against Posting without thought again. All of the QBs on that list have played against some tomato cans. I don't care about stats against top-10 teams, just wins regardless of stats.
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 13, 2017 14:37:51 GMT -5
our last 4 games were Army, UNLV, Rutgers and Maryland i'm more interested in stats vs top-10 teams, not teams Fillmore could throw 15 tds against It's easy to get preoccupied with those kinds of thoughts, but keep things in perspective, it becomes rather relative, as every single team on there has their share of creampuffs vs. 1st rate defenses to play against.
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 13, 2017 14:39:17 GMT -5
How does he have a 19-1 TD to INT ratio when he has only thrown 16 TDs? As galion indicated, stats can be twisted to favor what you want. But inviting TDs to do it seems to be a bit much. Was Ohio State the only school on that list that had the TDs for all of the school's QBs, not just the starter? Good question.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2017 6:29:48 GMT -5
our last 4 games were Army, UNLV, Rutgers and Maryland i'm more interested in stats vs top-10 teams, not teams Fillmore could throw 15 tds against It's easy to get preoccupied with those kinds of thoughts, but keep things in perspective, it becomes rather relative, as every single team on there has their share of creampuffs vs. 1st rate defenses to play against. You are correct sportsjock. Every team has had their run of " creampuffs", but is it to much to ask someone not to boast about beating those " creampuffs"? Let us all agree that those " creampuff"teams are on the schedule for stats, so don't be surprised when they happen.
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 14, 2017 7:21:29 GMT -5
It's easy to get preoccupied with those kinds of thoughts, but keep things in perspective, it becomes rather relative, as every single team on there has their share of creampuffs vs. 1st rate defenses to play against. You are correct sportsjock. Every team has had their run of " creampuffs", but is it to much to ask someone not to boast about beating those " creampuffs"? Let us all agree that those " creampuff"teams are on the schedule for stats, so don't be surprised when they happen. I seriously doubt any athletic director schedules an opponent to develop individual stats.and most soft opponents are a mandated league opponent.
|
|
|
Post by galion on Oct 14, 2017 8:17:43 GMT -5
So you're saying that OSU was forced to schedule Army and UNLV. I'm not saying that all top programs don't do it but let's face it, those teams are on the the schedule for a reason. That reason is to pad the schedule and inflate the stats.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2017 8:30:21 GMT -5
You are correct sportsjock. Every team has had their run of " creampuffs", but is it to much to ask someone not to boast about beating those " creampuffs"? Let us all agree that those " creampuff"teams are on the schedule for stats, so don't be surprised when they happen. I seriously doubt any athletic director schedules an opponent to develop individual stats.and most soft opponents are a mandated league opponent. What you smokin?
|
|
|
Post by 4 on Oct 14, 2017 19:29:53 GMT -5
Don't care who we're playing , Osu used to struggle offensively against bad teams. Even earlier this year. But man Barrett is playing really well lately! And I love the play calling.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Oct 14, 2017 21:43:22 GMT -5
So you're saying that OSU was forced to schedule Army and UNLV. I'm not saying that all top programs don't do it but let's face it, those teams are on the the schedule for a reason. That reason is to pad the schedule and inflate the stats. Of all your post you have never been further from the truth. The athletic budget AND the Big Ten FORCES Ohio State to schedule schools that don't require a home and home agreement. The only ones that will do that are the ones who get paid. As of last year there is now one more Big Ten game required by the Big Ten, thus every other year one fewer home game. Ohio State needs 7 home games to pay for all of the sports that lose money and the intramural sports program. This year they only have 6 home games. Saying the reason for Ohio State's schedule is to "inflate stats" is laughable.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Oct 14, 2017 21:58:44 GMT -5
I seriously doubt any athletic director schedules an opponent to develop individual stats.and most soft opponents are a mandated league opponent. What you smokin? What planet do you live on?? Soft non-league opponents NOT mandated, on Ohio State's schedule this year: Army and UNLV. Soft league opponents MANDATED by the Big Ten on Ohio State's schedule this year: Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska, Illinois maybe Indiana. TWICE as many soft opponents mandated by the Big Ten.
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 14, 2017 22:27:27 GMT -5
What planet do you live on?? Soft non-league opponents NOT mandated, on Ohio State's schedule this year: Army and UNLV. Soft league opponents MANDATED by the Big Ten on Ohio State's schedule this year: Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska, Illinois maybe Indiana. TWICE as many soft opponents mandated by the Big Ten. I think you understood what I was saying, but I'll admit, not properly worded. 'Mandated' was a poor choice of words. After I read it again, it left me scratching my head as well. I'm not smoker, a toker or midnight joker.
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 14, 2017 22:33:20 GMT -5
J.T. Barrett IV was nothing short of brilliant tonight! Can anyone explain why Damon Arnette had to sit for a half, even after the B1G office announced their review revealed it was not targeting and a mis-call by the officials. The penalty should have been waived.
|
|
|
Post by 4 on Oct 14, 2017 23:38:19 GMT -5
J.T. Barrett IV was nothing short of brilliant tonight! Can anyone explain why Damon Arnette had to sit for a half, even after the B1G office announced their review revealed it was not targeting and a mis-call by the officials. The penalty should have been waived. it was wards hit that they was wrong on.
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 15, 2017 6:26:54 GMT -5
J.T. Barrett IV was nothing short of brilliant tonight! Can anyone explain why Damon Arnette had to sit for a half, even after the B1G office announced their review revealed it was not targeting and a mis-call by the officials. The penalty should have been waived. it was wards hit that they was wrong on. Thanks for correcting me, it was Denzel Ward, please excuse me. Denzel was served a tremendous injustice by being penalized for a blatant infraction, he did not commit.
|
|
|
Post by Rambo McClain on Oct 15, 2017 7:23:36 GMT -5
JT playing like he did in 2014, but will he revert to the 5 yard and less JT vs PSU or continue to throw it downfield like a man?
Here's a snapshot at what JT was doing last night vs Nebraska. Yardage is distance ball went downfield relative to the line of scrimmage 3 11 36 4 21 -4 34 - drew pass interference 16 throw away 3 10 8 33 13 5 ^^^ Mixing it up nicely going long, intermediate and short. Well played game by JT.
Here's what JT did was doing vs Oklahoma 0 9 5 7 -1 -3 6 4 short, short, short, short, short then in the 3rd quarter he decided to start launching passes 31 14 incomplete 20 incomplete 6 22 incomplete 4 25 incomplete 4 INT ^^^ All the above are his actual successive throws in those games.
He wasn't mixing it up at all vs OU
If JT plays like this then OSU will win out in Big Ten play and make the playoff. If JT reverts to mainly throwing short then PSU will beat OSU.
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 15, 2017 15:15:27 GMT -5
JT playing like he did in 2014, but will he revert to the 5 yard and less JT vs PSU or continue to throw it downfield like a man? Here's a snapshot at what JT was doing last night vs Nebraska. Yardage is distance ball went downfield relative to the line of scrimmage 3 11 36 4 21 -4 34 - drew pass interference 16 throw away 3 10 8 33 13 5 ^^^ Mixing it up nicely going long, intermediate and short. Well played game by JT. Here's what JT did was doing vs Oklahoma 0 9 5 7 -1 -3 6 4 short, short, short, short, short then in the 3rd quarter he decided to start launching passes 31 14 incomplete 20 incomplete 6 22 incomplete 4 25 incomplete 4 INT ^^^ All the above are his actual successive throws in those games. He wasn't mixing it up at all vs OU If JT plays like this then OSU will win out in Big Ten play and make the playoff. If JT reverts to mainly throwing short then PSU will beat OSU. Now, this is a very good, analytical and insightful post. I agree with your assessment.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Oct 15, 2017 19:55:50 GMT -5
What planet do you live on?? Soft non-league opponents NOT mandated, on Ohio State's schedule this year: Army and UNLV. Soft league opponents MANDATED by the Big Ten on Ohio State's schedule this year: Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska, Illinois maybe Indiana. TWICE as many soft opponents mandated by the Big Ten. I think you understood what I was saying, but I'll admit, not properly worded. 'Mandated' was a poor choice of words. After I read it again, it left me scratching my head as well. I'm not smoker, a toker or midnight joker. I understood you perfectly. I was pointing out to scootyDude how so very wrong he was by challenging your position when he insulted you by saying you were smoking dope.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Oct 15, 2017 20:04:33 GMT -5
No "insight" on the plays called by the O-coordinators in those 2 games?? No "insight" on the OBVIOUS transition by the O-coordinators to integrate new pass plays into the URBAN MEYER offense?? No insight in how much better the receivers are running routes and catching balls in those 2 games?? No "insight" into how the trust between the QB, the O-line and wide receivers is overwhelmingly different now compared to early in the season??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2017 21:09:54 GMT -5
No "insight" on the plays called by the O-coordinators in those 2 games?? No "insight" on the OBVIOUS transition by the O-coordinators to integrate new pass plays into the URBAN MEYER offense?? No insight in how much better the receivers are running routes and catching balls in those 2 games?? No "insight" into how the trust between the QB, the O-line and wide receivers is overwhelmingly different now compared to early in the season?? I'm going to preface this by saying I hope this doesn't happen, but you are digging a whole you won't be able to get out of if Barrett sucks against Penn St
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 15, 2017 23:29:22 GMT -5
I think you understood what I was saying, but I'll admit, not properly worded. 'Mandated' was a poor choice of words. After I read it again, it left me scratching my head as well. I'm not smoker, a toker or midnight joker. I understood you perfectly. I was pointing out to scootyDude how so very wrong he was by challenging your position when he insulted you by saying you were smoking dope. Got it....
|
|
|
Post by sportsjock on Oct 15, 2017 23:38:51 GMT -5
No "insight" on the plays called by the O-coordinators in those 2 games?? No "insight" on the OBVIOUS transition by the O-coordinators to integrate new pass plays into the URBAN MEYER offense?? No insight in how much better the receivers are running routes and catching balls in those 2 games?? No "insight" into how the trust between the QB, the O-line and wide receivers is overwhelmingly different now compared to early in the season?? I'm going to preface this by saying I hope this doesn't happen, but you are digging a whole you won't be able to get out of if Barrett sucks against Penn St If, If, If, how about acknowledging the complete game of near flawless football he displayed at Nebraska, where his throws were on target and on time. The naysayers are silent, but insist he'll 'suck' vs. Penn State. Truth is, if he is brilliant once again vs. the Nit. Lions, it will be....he will 'suck' at Iowa, and you'll continue to kick the can down the alley to MSU and then Mich. At some point you will have to admit, he's playing pretty damn good football at this point in the season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2017 6:25:43 GMT -5
JT is playing well. I look forward to him playing well the rest of the way. If he does not it will be discussed that his good stats games happened against weak teams. It would be nice to see him left his play up the the level of the past few weeks against a big game opponent.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2017 6:41:24 GMT -5
I'm going to preface this by saying I hope this doesn't happen, but you are digging a whole you won't be able to get out of if Barrett sucks against Penn St If, If, If, how about acknowledging the complete game of near flawless football he displayed at Nebraska, where his throws were on target and on time. The naysayers are silent, but insist he'll 'suck' vs. Penn State. Truth is, if he is brilliant once again vs. the Nit. Lions, it will be....he will 'suck' at Iowa, and you'll continue to kick the can down the alley to MSU and then Mich. At some point you will have to admit, he's playing pretty damn good football at this point in the season. What are you talking about? I have not made a single comment on Barrett's play
|
|