|
Post by styxbb on Oct 27, 2018 8:09:37 GMT -5
I was underwhelmed by Clyde last night. Bellevue was strong defensively all season and shut down everyone in the lake except Tiffin. Young team and the future looks bright for these boys. Good luck to the Seniors.
|
|
|
Post by xbellevueplayer on Oct 27, 2018 8:15:14 GMT -5
Great team win tonight Red. Must admit I didn’t see the last two weeks coming but the boy play tough and hit hard tonight. Really controlled the game moving easily the entire game. Clyde has 2-3 deep pass plays including scores that was most of their yardage if I had to guess. Go Redmen Xbellevueplayar Be very proud,you guys are playing amazing right now and right now my choice as favorite next year in lake. Despite only 11 seniors we will lose enough to graduation though. A lot of the kids coming up lost at lower levels just hoping they continue to develop. Wish Keegan Ray would do like Jeff Polley did in 2001 and gather his backs n receivers practicing routes and timing during the summer. Good Leadership goes a long way.
|
|
|
Post by BellevueBuckeye on Oct 27, 2018 14:18:09 GMT -5
Looking at the past scores, there's a good chance last night's game winning TD was the latest lead change in a Bellevue-Clyde game in at least 100 years or possibly ever. The games I'm not sure about are 1997, 1998, and anything 1917 or older.
|
|
sbc95
All Conference
Posts: 361
|
Post by sbc95 on Oct 27, 2018 18:48:31 GMT -5
What’s the deal with the refs blowing this game for Clyde ??And why is it always at Bellevue when these refs favorite Bellevue??
|
|
|
Post by xbellevueplayer on Oct 27, 2018 18:56:25 GMT -5
What’s the deal with the refs blowing this game for Clyde ??And why is it always at Bellevue and it always favorite Bellevue?? 🙄 of course it had nothing to do with the Bellevue kids dominating the game besides a couple deep throws right? I asked a buddy of mine that’s a Clyde fan what the ruling was that gave bellevue the ball on the onside. That’s One question I would have but u have to question the bellevue D stonewalling the fliers on the 1 only for officials to signal touchdown very late while everyone’s standing around or walking away. That play was dead and shouldn’t have been a score. Also multiple holds on the ends by flier linemen but these officials called very little with what, 3 penalties total between the two teams?
|
|
|
Post by BellevueBuckeye on Oct 27, 2018 19:28:17 GMT -5
but u have to question the bellevue D stonewalling the fliers on the 1 only for officials to signal touchdown very late while everyone’s standing around or walking away. That play was dead and shouldn’t have been a score. Here's video of that play, albeit from the worst angle possible. You can't see where the ball is until the very end, which appeared to be the same issue the officials had. 11 seconds came off the clock on this play due to how long it took them to make a signal.
|
|
|
Post by jmorgret07 on Oct 27, 2018 21:42:13 GMT -5
What’s the deal with the refs blowing this game for Clyde ??And why is it always at Bellevue and it always favorite Bellevue?? 🙄 of course it had nothing to do with the Bellevue kids dominating the game besides a couple deep throws right? I asked a buddy of mine that’s a Clyde fan what the ruling was that gave bellevue the ball on the onside. That’s One question I would have but u have to question the bellevue D stonewalling the fliers on the 1 only for officials to signal touchdown very late while everyone’s standing around or walking away. That play was dead and shouldn’t have been a score. Also multiple holds on the ends by flier linemen but these officials called very little with what, 3 penalties total between the two teams? I was told that Bellevue was awarded possession because the kick never touched the ground before Clyde recovered, meaning the officials said Patynko caught the ball in air before it ever touched the ground after Newsome’s kick.
|
|
|
Post by jmorgret07 on Oct 27, 2018 21:43:30 GMT -5
but u have to question the bellevue D stonewalling the fliers on the 1 only for officials to signal touchdown very late while everyone’s standing around or walking away. That play was dead and shouldn’t have been a score. Here's video of that play, albeit from the worst angle possible. You can't see where the ball is until the very end, which appeared to be the same issue the officials had. 11 seconds came off the clock on this play due to how long it took them to make a signal. From the press box, he looked in. Of course the clock can run until a decision is made. How about the clock stopping on the last drive when the Bellevue receiver was ruled inbounds, but short of the first down?
|
|
|
Post by BellevueBuckeye on Oct 27, 2018 22:34:49 GMT -5
I was told that Bellevue was awarded possession because the kick never touched the ground before Clyde recovered, meaning the officials said Patynko caught the ball in air before it ever touched the ground after Newsome’s kick. Had to look up the rule, and this is covered under rule 6.1 Article 5 (on page 55 of this pdf: www.sdcfoa.org/wp-content/uploads/NFHS_Rules.pdf)It says: "Any K player may recover a free kick if it has both touched the ground and goes beyond the pane of R's free kick line. The two requirements may occur in any order" So the only question is whether or not it was caught on the fly, and going by my own memory I think it was. I remember being amazed that it was timed so well, not realizing that Clyde touching it first like that would be illegal. Any video of this play? Which play was that? Was it near the sideline?
|
|
|
Post by xbellevueplayer on Oct 27, 2018 23:49:42 GMT -5
I was told that Bellevue was awarded possession because the kick never touched the ground before Clyde recovered, meaning the officials said Patynko caught the ball in air before it ever touched the ground after Newsome’s kick. Had to look up the rule, and this is covered under rule 6.1 Article 5 (on page 55 of this pdf: www.sdcfoa.org/wp-content/uploads/NFHS_Rules.pdf)It says: "Any K player may recover a free kick if it has both touched the ground and goes beyond the pane of R's free kick line. The two requirements may occur in any order" So the only question is whether or not it was caught on the fly, and going by my own memory I think it was. I remember being amazed that it was timed so well, not realizing that Clyde touching it first like that would be illegal. Any video of this play? Which play was that? Was it near the sideline? That would explain it perfectly even for Clyde fans then. Thank u!! And I looked at that clock after every play on the final drive and don’t recall the clock stopping besides on the first downs and when Keegan spiked the ball to stop the clock.
|
|
|
Post by 4th & 1 on Oct 28, 2018 5:29:53 GMT -5
There were definitely clock issues at the end. And the kick recovery happened right in front of me. I’m 100% positive the ball hit the ground and bounced perfectly backwards into a Clyde players hands. However, I wasn’t close enough to see if he was out of bounds. The official who made the ruling, Clyde possession, obviously seen it the same way everyone else over there seen it. Anyways, fun game. Five out of Clyde’s last six games have been very exciting and down to the wire so I’m glad the Bellevue game didn’t disappoint. A loss like this has been coming for Clyde at some point. I’ve never seen coaches do more with a group of guys than this Flier squad. I’m a huge Clyde fan, but they have continued to overachieve all season. It’s certainly made for some fun football games to watch.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 28, 2018 11:10:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by BellevueBuckeye on Oct 28, 2018 11:36:44 GMT -5
I know that 19-13 & 12-7 were the finals in those 2 games, what I don't know for sure is whether or not a lead change took place in the final 30 seconds.
|
|
|
Post by maplecityjake on Oct 28, 2018 11:46:47 GMT -5
Based from my memory(maybe not good barometer, haha), I don't think there were late game lead changes like the other night
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 28, 2018 12:35:21 GMT -5
I know that 19-13 & 12-7 were the finals in those 2 games, what I don't know for sure is whether or not a lead change took place in the final 30 seconds. Gotcha, per Sandusky Register 1997 Cade Renfro scored on a 29 yard run with 4:39 left to tie it at 13, Clyde missed the extra point Russ Kuhns scored from 5 yards out with 45 seconds remaining for the winning score. 1998 Clyde led 7-0 at the half Bellevue took the lead 12-7 in the 3rd quarter ^^^ Mark McGwire hit his 64th home run that night, Sammy Sosa remained at 63. Also of note as I was looking for game info Full-time in-state student fees at main campus 1997 $5,512 Miami $4,460 Kent State $4,359 Cincinnati $4,275 Ohio $4,422 BGSU $3,952 Toledo $3,708 Wright State $3,660 Ohio State $3,626 Akron $3,498 Youngstown State $3,456 Cleveland State $3,090 Shawnee State
|
|
|
Post by jmorgret07 on Oct 28, 2018 19:50:50 GMT -5
I was told that Bellevue was awarded possession because the kick never touched the ground before Clyde recovered, meaning the officials said Patynko caught the ball in air before it ever touched the ground after Newsome’s kick. Had to look up the rule, and this is covered under rule 6.1 Article 5 (on page 55 of this pdf: www.sdcfoa.org/wp-content/uploads/NFHS_Rules.pdf)It says: "Any K player may recover a free kick if it has both touched the ground and goes beyond the pane of R's free kick line. The two requirements may occur in any order" So the only question is whether or not it was caught on the fly, and going by my own memory I think it was. I remember being amazed that it was timed so well, not realizing that Clyde touching it first like that would be illegal. Any video of this play? Which play was that? Was it near the sideline? I believe it was the eight-yard completion from Ray to Sparling where the play ended at the Clyde 26.
|
|
|
Post by bigman on Oct 29, 2018 9:47:14 GMT -5
I was told that Bellevue was awarded possession because the kick never touched the ground before Clyde recovered, meaning the officials said Patynko caught the ball in air before it ever touched the ground after Newsome’s kick. Had to look up the rule, and this is covered under rule 6.1 Article 5 (on page 55 of this pdf: www.sdcfoa.org/wp-content/uploads/NFHS_Rules.pdf)It says: "Any K player may recover a free kick if it has both touched the ground and goes beyond the pane of R's free kick line. The two requirements may occur in any order" So the only question is whether or not it was caught on the fly, and going by my own memory I think it was. I remember being amazed that it was timed so well, not realizing that Clyde touching it first like that would be illegal. Any video of this play? Which play was that? Was it near the sideline? If you watch the film of the reception on the sideline you will notice the side judge waving his arms above his head to kill the clock, thus ruling him out of bounds.
|
|
footballfan
All Conference
2017 SBC Pick'em Champion
Posts: 347
|
Post by footballfan on Oct 30, 2018 18:40:33 GMT -5
Would of could of should of!!!! The better team won this night! Good luck to Bellevue in the next few years. I'm sure a lot of schools would love a down year at 4-6 and only 4 out of 6 loses coming by a TD. GO BIG RED!!!!
|
|
sbc95
All Conference
Posts: 361
|
Post by sbc95 on Nov 1, 2018 22:56:10 GMT -5
The FEATHER strikes again!!
|
|