Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2017 10:32:39 GMT -5
Still remaining. #1 Sandusky #2 Lexington #4 Ontario #6 Sandusky Perkins
Gone fishing #3 Vermillion #5 Huron #7 Madison #8 Shelby #9 Bellevue #10 Norwalk #11 Clyde #12 Port Clinton
|
|
bigox
All Conference
Posts: 449
|
Post by bigox on Mar 4, 2017 10:34:43 GMT -5
Still remaining. #1 Sandusky #2 Lexington #4 Ontario #6 Sandusky Perkins Gone fishing #3 Vermillion #5 Huron #7 Madison #8 Shelby #9 Bellevue #10 Norwalk #11 Clyde #12 Port Clinton Or back to the woods😎😎
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2017 10:40:28 GMT -5
Only a few.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2017 12:13:28 GMT -5
I think whoever wins between Perkins and Sandusky makes it to regionals. I say Perkins 65-57. I think there depth and size will be to much for the Streaks this time.
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Mar 4, 2017 12:55:34 GMT -5
I think whoever wins between Perkins and Sandusky makes it to regionals. I say Perkins 65-57. I think there depth and size will be to much for the Streaks this time. It will come down to guard play Perkins has to USE the height advantage for it to truly be an advantage... I would agree they appear to be peaking however beating a so-so Madison team and a severely overrated Huron team is NOT beating Sandusky...
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Mar 4, 2017 13:06:58 GMT -5
In the other District semi a quick look at the two teams would definitively tell you (Other than WF who is already calling a CYA loss) OHS has to be favored. Since Christmas OHS is 16-1 (only loss coming to #1 seed Sandusky) While Lex is 9-7 with BAD losses to Mount Vernon, Madison and Mansfield Senior... So if OHS losses I don't want to hear WF come and here and say JB lost to a team seeded higher (token OCC seed) who cares... this is a game they should win...
|
|
|
Post by mrsteel on Mar 4, 2017 13:09:12 GMT -5
So lex got the higher seed because it's a token occ seed?
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 4, 2017 13:54:49 GMT -5
In the other District semi a quick look at the two teams would definitively tell you (Other than WF who is already calling a CYA loss) OHS has to be favored. Since Christmas OHS is 16-1 (only loss coming to #1 seed Sandusky) While Lex is 9-7 with BAD losses to Mount Vernon, Madison and Mansfield Senior... So if OHS losses I don't want to hear WF come and here and say JB lost to a team seeded higher (token OCC seed) who cares... this is a game they should win... PLEASE, don't make up untruths about what I've said. What I've REALLY said? Nothing more than higher seeds SHOULD beat lower seeds, not all the time, but the vast majority of the time. I've used math in making decisions most of my life. One can NEVER be right 100% of the time, but being right 60 vs 40 is a money maker. I play the odds, port's reasoning is based on what is best for his put downs and insults. I can't bet on Ontario in this game, not that I don't want them to win, OBVIOUSLY. However, the basketball coaches in this area say Lex should win. We should take your word over theirs?? Lex beat Ontario AT Ontario during the regular season. Lex was up by double digits most of game, went into an end of game shell and Ontario got it down to 5. Here's another homework assignment for port. I know you have a disdain for research, and prefer to shoot from the hip, but look and see what % of higher seeds have won games thus far in the tournament and report back to us. BTW, where are the answers to the MANY questions I've asked you, that you PROMISED to get for me. Each post you make without them, just reinforces what we all know. That you are not a good man, instead an untrustworthy sycophant. I will continue to ask this question on every disparaging post you make, until you fulfill YOUR PROMISE.
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Mar 4, 2017 13:59:18 GMT -5
So lex got the higher seed because it's a token occ seed? Looks like it to me OHS had a better record albeit against a much softer schedule. Other than the BAD loss to Bellevue OHS has nothing that compares to the stinkers I mentioned for Lex. I get it Lex beat them head to head however that was earlier and OHS was busy getting off to a 2-4 start to the season. So basically a coin flip iimo and Lex is the OCC team in this district... Do you disagree that at the time of seeding this was a coin flip??? Or do you believe Lex was clear cut better???
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Mar 4, 2017 14:05:36 GMT -5
In the other District semi a quick look at the two teams would definitively tell you (Other than WF who is already calling a CYA loss) OHS has to be favored. Since Christmas OHS is 16-1 (only loss coming to #1 seed Sandusky) While Lex is 9-7 with BAD losses to Mount Vernon, Madison and Mansfield Senior... So if OHS losses I don't want to hear WF come and here and say JB lost to a team seeded higher (token OCC seed) who cares... this is a game they should win... PLEASE, don't make up untruths about what I've said. What I've REALLY said? Nothing more than higher seeds SHOULD beat lower seeds, not all the time, but the vast majority of the time. I've used math in making decisions most of my life. One can NEVER be right 100% of the time, but being right 60 vs 40 is a money maker. I play the odds, port's reasoning is based on what is best for his put downs and insults. I can't bet on Ontario in this game, not that I don't want them to win, OBVIOUSLY. However, the basketball coaches in this area say Lex should win. Lex beat Ontario AT Ontario during the regular season. Lex was up by double digits most of game, went into an end of game shell and Ontario got it down to 5. Here's another homework assignment for port. I know you have a disdain for research, and prefer to shoot from the hip, but look and see what % of higher seeds have won games thus far in the tournament and report back to us. BTW, where are the answers to the MANY questions I've asked you, that you PROMISED to get for me. Each post you make without them, just reinforces what we all know, that you are not a good man, instead an untrustworthy sycophant. I will continue to ask this question on every disparaging post you make until you fulfill YOUR PROMISE. How many times have I heard you say or use the excuse they lost to a higher seed as JB apology for 0fer??? You go back and point to a game in December... By this logic is Bellevue better than OHS??? Then you go back to higher seeds... We are talking a 3 vs a 4 not an 8 vs a 1... As for questions don't have time to read back through your blather as a question and I will answer. However do you honestly believe Vegas would favor Lex v OHS on a neutral floor... The only reason would be JB's history...
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 4, 2017 14:09:37 GMT -5
Let me put it this way. If you had to bet $1000 of your money on this game who would you bet on? Even though $1000 isn't a lot of money for me, I can't bet on Ontario. What I am confident of though, is betting $1000 on you NOT betting on Ontario.
Another point in Lexington's favor. Ontario has no answer for Lexington's 6-5 220 very athletic, future Ohio State Buckeye. As Coach Gray found out.
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Mar 4, 2017 14:15:04 GMT -5
Let me put it this way. If you had to bet $1000 of your money on this game who would you bet on? Even though $1000 isn't a lot of money for me, I can't bet on Ontario. What I am confident of though, is betting $1000 on you NOT betting on Ontario. Another point in Lexington's favor. Ontario has no answer for Lexington's 6-5 220 very athletic, future Ohio State Buckeye. As Coach Gray found out. Okay there is a question and I will answer NO I wouldn't bet $1000 on a game this evenly matched. I am glad a $1000 is nothing to you however I would say if I was to bet on the game ($5 v WF) I WOULD bet on OHS I think JB moves on...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2017 14:24:51 GMT -5
$1000 is a lot Air Max Monarchs
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 4, 2017 14:34:58 GMT -5
PLEASE, don't make up untruths about what I've said. What I've REALLY said? Nothing more than higher seeds SHOULD beat lower seeds, not all the time, but the vast majority of the time. I've used math in making decisions most of my life. One can NEVER be right 100% of the time, but being right 60 vs 40 is a money maker. I play the odds, port's reasoning is based on what is best for his put downs and insults. I can't bet on Ontario in this game, not that I don't want them to win, OBVIOUSLY. However, the basketball coaches in this area say Lex should win. Lex beat Ontario AT Ontario during the regular season. Lex was up by double digits most of game, went into an end of game shell and Ontario got it down to 5. Here's another homework assignment for port. I know you have a disdain for research, and prefer to shoot from the hip, but look and see what % of higher seeds have won games thus far in the tournament and report back to us. BTW, where are the answers to the MANY questions I've asked you, that you PROMISED to get for me. Each post you make without them, just reinforces what we all know, that you are not a good man, instead an untrustworthy sycophant. I will continue to ask this question on every disparaging post you make until you fulfill YOUR PROMISE. How many times have I heard you say or use the excuse they lost to a higher seed as JB apology for 0fer??? You go back and point to a game in December... By this logic is Bellevue better than OHS??? Then you go back to higher seeds... We are talking a 3 vs a 4 not an 8 vs a 1... As for questions don't have time to read back through your blather as a question and I will answer. However do you honestly believe Vegas would favor Lex v OHS on a neutral floor... The only reason would be JB's history... More UNTRUTHS from port. It is getting embarrassing for you. I have NEVER used "excuses" for anything, only losers do that. AGAIN, coaches say higher seeds should win. Higher seeds usually do win. It would be stupid to go against the experts and the math. AGAIN, upsets happen. What do you call what Ontario did to the omipotent Norwalk team in Ontario's first game against them in the NOL? Now you prove your lack of knowledge, it's getting more embarrassing for you. "We" are not talking about the same thing. "I" KNOW this is a 2 VS 4. You ignorantly think it's a 3 vs 4. BTW, after talking to a couple of insiders. #2 seed Lex was close to #1 seed and #4 seed Ontario was even closer to #5 seed. Thus it is even a wider game than 2 vs 4. Successful bettors use every nugget before laying a bet. Yes, JB's entire history, not pick and choose history, like LOSER bettors would do. If you have time for inane put down posts you should have time to do some intellectual work and FULFILL YOUR PROMISES. The North Coast world waits to see what you're made of.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 4, 2017 14:46:58 GMT -5
Let me put it this way. If you had to bet $1000 of your money on this game who would you bet on? Even though $1000 isn't a lot of money for me, I can't bet on Ontario. What I am confident of though, is betting $1000 on you NOT betting on Ontario. Another point in Lexington's favor. Ontario has no answer for Lexington's 6-5 220 very athletic, future Ohio State Buckeye. As Coach Gray found out. Okay there is a question and I wouldn't bet $1000 on a game this evenly matched. I am glad a $1000 is nothing to you however I would say if I was to bet on the game ($5 v WF) I WOULD bet on OHS I think JB moves on... MORE UNTRUTHS from you, if the untruths keep up I might have to start using a harsher word. You NEVER correctly quote what anyone says. Another very troubling aspect of your perversion. My EXACT WORDS, "$1000 is not a lot of money for me." You saying that I said, "$1000 is nothing", not only is UNTRUE, it is STUPID of you. $1000 is a year's supply of Dewars. Still no answers that YOU PROMISED. It is starting to look REALLY bad for you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2017 14:52:28 GMT -5
How many times have I heard you say or use the excuse they lost to a higher seed as JB apology for 0fer??? You go back and point to a game in December... By this logic is Bellevue better than OHS??? Then you go back to higher seeds... We are talking a 3 vs a 4 not an 8 vs a 1... As for questions don't have time to read back through your blather as a question and I will answer. However do you honestly believe Vegas would favor Lex v OHS on a neutral floor... The only reason would be JB's history... Lexington is actually the #2 seed although I did hear they were 1 point away from being the #3 seed.
|
|
|
Post by BellevueBuckeye on Mar 4, 2017 15:08:38 GMT -5
Okay there is a question and I wouldn't bet $1000 on a game this evenly matched. I am glad a $1000 is nothing to you however I would say if I was to bet on the game ($5 v WF) I WOULD bet on OHS I think JB moves on... MORE UNTRUTHS from you, if the untruths keep up I might have to start using a harsher word. You NEVER correctly quote what anyone says. Another very troubling aspect of your perversion. My EXACT WORDS, "$1000 is not a lot of money for me." You saying that I said, "$1000 is nothing", not only is UNTRUE, it is STUPID of you. $1000 is a year's supply of Dewars. Still no answers that YOU PROMISED. It is starting to look REALLY bad for you. Did you do something to cause that link to appear in the quote of portwalk's post, or did that happen on its own? I've seen that weird link thing appear twice now and both times it's been in posts by you.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 4, 2017 15:17:51 GMT -5
On it's own. It looks like adware.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2017 15:42:40 GMT -5
One positive thing for us about Huron losing so badly to Perkins is, Dumb and his other aliases he uses, Won't be on here much anymore. Thank God.
|
|
|
Post by deathfromabove on Mar 4, 2017 16:10:10 GMT -5
Mark, You better watch what you say, there is baseball, softball, track and field, and boys tennis coming up next. They might start saying that there is no one around to beat them and they will be crowned state champs in all of them.
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Mar 4, 2017 20:49:15 GMT -5
WF as I said ask me a question and I will answer... Since $1000 is not a lot of money to you $5 is a drop in the bucket I got OHS for $5 even up???
|
|
|
Post by pickett79 on Mar 4, 2017 21:03:50 GMT -5
Congrats you guys can dog the Tigers who were riddled with injuries late in the season. Davis who started and had 20 points against the pirates the first time they played was out with injury. The two best pieces the tigers are returning for next year also didn't play (Barnes and Pickett). But the tigers exceeded expectations this season and will be even better next season so I'll be patient and Bobby's boys will prove you old hags wrong once again. Fillmore $1000 isn't a lot to you? Wow, you are one cool dude to be tooting your horn anonymously on this website. If you really were making that money you wouldn't spend the majority of your life on this site or around high school sports let's be honest. My son Pickett actually works for his own money at pouses tractors and lives off the land in the woods like a real man. Just go collect your social security and get off this site you dumpy old fart.
As for the tigers, great season. The tigers are only graduating one key piece of their team and that is the Jared Hohler. Although Jared is one of the best athletes to ever step into the halls of HHS I believe the tigers will bounce back stronger than ever. This was the rebuilding year for the tough tigers , they will not dump next year as they will easily be district champs. Sniff my farts
Go tigers
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 4, 2017 21:19:20 GMT -5
How many year's of eligibility do your friends have?? I've been told both will soon have their 20th birthdays. They can't go too far with the fake IDs made by the guy at Ohio U with the crooked nose and cauliflower ear.
I told you Bobby wasn't too bright going to the bracket he did. You know his boys could have beat both Ontario and Vermilion. If you've got an extra $100, I've got a stock tip for you, IMMU. Could be a 20x in a couple of years. I spend a lot of time on my computers watching the market. So why not check in here and look you up for a few laughs? Maybe you'll be lucky one day and not have to work, long before social security days. Possible, but unlikely, due to your ignorant ugly mouth. With that mouth, no one will hire you or trust you, after your days of cleaning the bathrooms at McDonalds. Thanks for playin.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 4, 2017 21:43:32 GMT -5
WF as I said ask me a question and I will answer... Since $1000 is not a lot of money to you $5 is a drop in the bucket I got OHS for $5 even up??? I gotta have 6 points. Lex beat Ontario by 5 AT Ontario. I'm giving you a break, as 1 point isn't much given neutral floor vs home court. Also, I'd be breaking a long standing rule, given to me by a successful sports bettor. NEVER bet on a game with a team that you have an emotional attachment to. Since I stopped betting on Ohio State and the Browns games, my success rate has improved considerably.
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Mar 4, 2017 21:45:05 GMT -5
I'm lost... I want OHS and need NO points as I believe at this point they will win...
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 4, 2017 21:53:09 GMT -5
Walk in the wilderness with me. You're letting your emotions get the best of you, not good if laying money on anything.
|
|
|
Post by 94hoops on Mar 5, 2017 10:46:16 GMT -5
DUMP has proven not to be the brightest of our young society.
|
|
Hagen
All Conference
Posts: 288
|
Post by Hagen on Mar 6, 2017 10:44:49 GMT -5
Okay there is a question and I wouldn't bet $1000 on a game this evenly matched. I am glad a $1000 is nothing to you however I would say if I was to bet on the game ($5 v WF) I WOULD bet on OHS I think JB moves on... MORE UNTRUTHS from you, if the untruths keep up I might have to start using a harsher word. You NEVER correctly quote what anyone says. Another very troubling aspect of your perversion. My EXACT WORDS, "$1000 is not a lot of money for me." You saying that I said, "$1000 is nothing", not only is UNTRUE, it is STUPID of you. $1000 is a year's supply of Dewars. Still no answers that YOU PROMISED. It is starting to look REALLY bad for you.
|
|