|
Post by illuminator on Mar 11, 2020 16:44:20 GMT -5
Lmao you Willard people are absolutely incredible. 18 pages on this forum just to lose in the district semi finals, what an absolute joke. Willard needs to learn from the humble and hard working people of Clyde, who often overachieve and surpass expectations during their incredible football run this year. The past of basketball excellence in Willard will not “reload” because it is no more. The town of Willard is a complete dump and is an absolute joke in every other sport but basketball where they were good this year. Willard had two above average players and you fools absolutely lose your minds. Good luck next year and don’t get your hopes up because you will eventually be disappointed.
|
|
|
Post by truecrimson on Mar 12, 2020 5:31:26 GMT -5
Based on what? Other than the one game against Willard what made you believe CC was better? Common opp. Willard was 3-0 vs Upper, Wynford and Carey throttling the latter 2. They were 4-2 vs common opp above including a beat down by 29 by Upper and a narrow victory over Wynford. CC also lost to Lex an inferior team to Willard and one of their only regular season challenges. All of these reasons are why Willard was favored and would be again. By your logic (one game) Norwalk was better than Sandusky clearly... Willard played as bad as they had all year and only lost by 4.no one has mentioned the bad coaching job by willard.joe has issues in real time basketball.he done it last year against Coldwater.majority of teams that make it to districts and beyond have at least one if not two really good shooters.cc had one but he waited til the kid made 4 threes before he decided to get a guy glued to him.cc coach came out with a triangle and 2.didnt want tb or cp to beat them. Well damn that's smart! Coaches didn't know what to do and obviously didn't game plan for it.why not?I mentioned early in the year that a triangle and two would cause major problems for us.coach grey used it against us but it looked like we were ready for it.im still scratching my head over the last 25 seconds.i understand the philosophy but don't agree with it at all.cc was on their heels then that...all we had to do is try to steal the ball and or foul.what a mess.i had concerns last year about in game coaching and caught total hell for it but that's ok.when it comes to a big game and big moments I just don't think we have a big time coach.easy to coach when your up a bunch.cc coach had a great game plan and it showed. I love that you aren't afraid of the backlash and always speak your mind, not too many would have the b's to do this. Watching OG and CC last night it is clear OG is on another level. They are obviously one of the premier programs in DIII in the state. They toyed with CC and easily beat them by 30+. It has been fun to watch Willard over the last few years but we'll fall on some tough times over the next few years. Give CC the credit, they scouted Willard well and had the perfect game plan and executed to perfection. Not sure where Willard's scoring is coming from next year but some are predicting them to challenge for the Bay, that will be a tough order. I think Willard will be back in a similar situation they were in his first year here, rebuilding years.
|
|
will
All Conference
Posts: 118
|
Post by will on Mar 12, 2020 7:18:15 GMT -5
I love that you aren't afraid of the backlash and always speak your mind, not too many would have the b's to do this. Watching OG and CC last night it is clear OG is on another level. They are obviously one of the premier programs in DIII in the state. They toyed with CC and easily beat them by 30+. It has been fun to watch Willard over the last few years but we'll fall on some tough times over the next few years. Give CC the credit, they scouted Willard well and had the perfect game plan and executed to perfection. Not sure where Willard's scoring is coming from next year but some are predicting them to challenge for the Bay, that will be a tough order. I think Willard will be back in a similar situation they were in his first year here, rebuilding years. I haven't watched a whole lot of basketball in the past 20 years, but what little I have watched of the Flashes makes me agree with truecrimson. Rebuilding years. If I can stay a loyal football fan through the past decade, I can continue to root on the basketball team and hope that we still have some good years ahead of us in the future.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Mar 12, 2020 7:18:59 GMT -5
Willard played as bad as they had all year and only lost by 4.no one has mentioned the bad coaching job by willard.joe has issues in real time basketball.he done it last year against Coldwater.majority of teams that make it to districts and beyond have at least one if not two really good shooters.cc had one but he waited til the kid made 4 threes before he decided to get a guy glued to him.cc coach came out with a triangle and 2.didnt want tb or cp to beat them. Well damn that's smart! Coaches didn't know what to do and obviously didn't game plan for it.why not?I mentioned early in the year that a triangle and two would cause major problems for us.coach grey used it against us but it looked like we were ready for it.im still scratching my head over the last 25 seconds.i understand the philosophy but don't agree with it at all.cc was on their heels then that...all we had to do is try to steal the ball and or foul.what a mess.i had concerns last year about in game coaching and caught total hell for it but that's ok.when it comes to a big game and big moments I just don't think we have a big time coach.easy to coach when your up a bunch.cc coach had a great game plan and it showed. I love that you aren't afraid of the backlash and always speak your mind, not too many would have the b's to do this. Watching OG and CC last night it is clear OG is on another level. They are obviously one of the premier programs in DIII in the state. They toyed with CC and easily beat them by 30+. It has been fun to watch Willard over the last few years but we'll fall on some tough times over the next few years. Give CC the credit, they scouted Willard well and had the perfect game plan and executed to perfection. Not sure where Willard's scoring is coming from next year but some are predicting them to challenge for the Bay, that will be a tough order. I think Willard will be back in a similar situation they were in his first year here, rebuilding years. Your prediction for next year says alot about your opinion of the 4 guys (of 6 who saw playing time) returning next year. Scoring points next year will be a concern, I agree. However, there are guys who are capable. It's extremely difficult to determine where they'll come from right now, mainly because 1 guy took 35% of the shots and the other guy took 25%, that left 10% each for the remaining 4 players. We will be a much different team next year. To say we will be in a similar situation to Joe's first year is just non-sense. Look at the league, the only team that will probably be clearly better that us is Margaretta. Huron will be solid but not clearly better. No way we should lose to OH, PC, nor Edison. If we play the same non conference schedule next year, we should win 7 of those games based on their returning players.....Perkins, Wynford, Bucyrus, Carey, Bellevue, Buckeye Central, and Upper. Norwalk, St Paul, Tiffin, Shelby and maybe Northwestern will be a challenge.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 12, 2020 8:03:13 GMT -5
Your prediction for next year says alot about your opinion of the 4 guys (of 6 who saw playing time) returning next year. Scoring points next year will be a concern, I agree. However, there are guys who are capable. It's extremely difficult to determine where they'll come from right now, mainly because 1 guy took 35% of the shots and the other guy took 25%, that left 10% each for the remaining 4 players. We will be a much different team next year. To say we will be in a similar situation to Joe's first year is just non-sense. Look at the league, the only team that will probably be clearly better that us is Margaretta. Huron will be solid but not clearly better. No way we should lose to OH, PC, nor Edison. If we play the same non conference schedule next year, we should win 7 of those games based on their returning players.....Perkins, Wynford, Bucyrus, Carey, Bellevue, Buckeye Central, and Upper. Norwalk, St Paul, Tiffin, Shelby and maybe Northwestern will be a challenge. So you are saying that Willard can find a successful way to replace the loss of 60% of their shooting but 10 of the other schools you play can't get better with their returning players. A coach with 2 state titles and 7 trips to Columbus once said that if his team wins 20 games in a season they better be playing for a regional title.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Mar 12, 2020 8:08:37 GMT -5
Your prediction for next year says alot about your opinion of the 4 guys (of 6 who saw playing time) returning next year. Scoring points next year will be a concern, I agree. However, there are guys who are capable. It's extremely difficult to determine where they'll come from right now, mainly because 1 guy took 35% of the shots and the other guy took 25%, that left 10% each for the remaining 4 players. We will be a much different team next year. To say we will be in a similar situation to Joe's first year is just non-sense. Look at the league, the only team that will probably be clearly better that us is Margaretta. Huron will be solid but not clearly better. No way we should lose to OH, PC, nor Edison. If we play the same non conference schedule next year, we should win 7 of those games based on their returning players.....Perkins, Wynford, Bucyrus, Carey, Bellevue, Buckeye Central, and Upper. Norwalk, St Paul, Tiffin, Shelby and maybe Northwestern will be a challenge. So you are saying that Willard can find a successful way to replace the loss of 60% of their shooting but 10 of the other schools you play can't get better with their returning players. A coach with 2 state titles and 7 trips to Columbus once said that if his team wins 20 games in a season they better be playing for a regional title. No, that's not what I said, and I'm not sure of the relevance of your last sentence. I certainly expect every team to get better. My comments were strictly based on the talent level and experience of the underclassmen of the teams we played this year.
|
|
|
Post by truecrimson on Mar 12, 2020 8:24:19 GMT -5
I love that you aren't afraid of the backlash and always speak your mind, not too many would have the b's to do this. Watching OG and CC last night it is clear OG is on another level. They are obviously one of the premier programs in DIII in the state. They toyed with CC and easily beat them by 30+. It has been fun to watch Willard over the last few years but we'll fall on some tough times over the next few years. Give CC the credit, they scouted Willard well and had the perfect game plan and executed to perfection. Not sure where Willard's scoring is coming from next year but some are predicting them to challenge for the Bay, that will be a tough order. I think Willard will be back in a similar situation they were in his first year here, rebuilding years. Your prediction for next year says alot about your opinion of the 4 guys (of 6 who saw playing time) returning next year. Scoring points next year will be a concern, I agree. However, there are guys who are capable. It's extremely difficult to determine where they'll come from right now, mainly because 1 guy took 35% of the shots and the other guy took 25%, that left 10% each for the remaining 4 players. We will be a much different team next year. To say we will be in a similar situation to Joe's first year is just non-sense. Look at the league, the only team that will probably be clearly better that us is Margaretta. Huron will be solid but not clearly better. No way we should lose to OH, PC, nor Edison. If we play the same non conference schedule next year, we should win 7 of those games based on their returning players.....Perkins, Wynford, Bucyrus, Carey, Bellevue, Buckeye Central, and Upper. Norwalk, St Paul, Tiffin, Shelby and maybe Northwestern will be a challenge. My prediction is valid until proven otherwise. I hope they do have kids stepping into these positions lost by graduation and do great. 40 points a game is the bigger number, not the 60% shots taken. Of those 60% shots taken by these two they hit 60%+ of their shots while others hit much much less % wise. Leadership is also an unknown so yes, I believe Willard will be in the same situation they were in during Joe's first year. time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 12, 2020 8:31:21 GMT -5
So you are saying that Willard can find a successful way to replace the loss of 60% of their shooting but 10 of the other schools you play can't get better with their returning players. A coach with 2 state titles and 7 trips to Columbus once said that if his team wins 20 games in a season they better be playing for a regional title. No, that's not what I said, and I'm not sure of the relevance of your last sentence. I certainly expect every team to get better. My comments were strictly based on the talent level and experience of the underclassmen of the teams we played this year. The relevance of my last sentence was a bonus thought for you to think about. While it is obvious that you place value on a good record, there are coaches that look at success differently. In short he was saying he would rather play a schedule that could limit them to 14 to 16 wins but help prepare them for a tournament trip to regional or beyond. He sees little value in a 20 win season unless it means he has played in 28 games. Every non-league game he plays is a team from a bigger division or with equal success as his team.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Mar 12, 2020 8:35:38 GMT -5
Your prediction for next year says alot about your opinion of the 4 guys (of 6 who saw playing time) returning next year. Scoring points next year will be a concern, I agree. However, there are guys who are capable. It's extremely difficult to determine where they'll come from right now, mainly because 1 guy took 35% of the shots and the other guy took 25%, that left 10% each for the remaining 4 players. We will be a much different team next year. To say we will be in a similar situation to Joe's first year is just non-sense. Look at the league, the only team that will probably be clearly better that us is Margaretta. Huron will be solid but not clearly better. No way we should lose to OH, PC, nor Edison. If we play the same non conference schedule next year, we should win 7 of those games based on their returning players.....Perkins, Wynford, Bucyrus, Carey, Bellevue, Buckeye Central, and Upper. Norwalk, St Paul, Tiffin, Shelby and maybe Northwestern will be a challenge. My prediction is valid until proven otherwise. I hope they do have kids stepping into these positions lost by graduation and do great. 40 points a game is the bigger number, not the 60% shots taken. Of those 60% shots taken by these two they hit 60%+ of their shots while others hit much much less % wise. Leadership is also an unknown so yes, I believe Willard will be in the same situation they were in during Joe's first year. time will tell. First, I'm not begrudging the 60% of the shots taken by the 2 Seniors. They were the only 2 proven scorers we had. Secondly, a prediction is just an opinion. Your entitled to yours, as I am mine. Validity for either is meaningless. Lastly, if either one of those Seniors came close to making 60% of their shots, they both would be 1st team all ohioans and up for state player of the year. You're about 20% off. 60% shooting, especially from the perimeter, is almost unheard of.
|
|
|
Post by xlegend on Mar 12, 2020 8:48:21 GMT -5
So you are saying that Willard can find a successful way to replace the loss of 60% of their shooting but 10 of the other schools you play can't get better with their returning players. A coach with 2 state titles and 7 trips to Columbus once said that if his team wins 20 games in a season they better be playing for a regional title. No, that's not what I said, and I'm not sure of the relevance of your last sentence. I certainly expect every team to get better. My comments were strictly based on the talent level and experience of the underclassmen of the teams we played this year. I agree with c5.just like any other school losing their studs someone else has to step up .the 55 percent of shots taken by cp and tb will be distributed through someone else.who will that be? I'm guessing trey and myles.and that's where the shots should come from.now...can trey and Myles handle the pressure of being the go 2 guy's?I think so but only time will tell.i heard trey is playing aau with tnba which is a high caliber aau program.myles is playing with Ohio hoops.not to sure about that program . their the only two kids that I know of that are playing aau.
|
|
|
Post by xlegend on Mar 12, 2020 8:59:25 GMT -5
Willard played as bad as they had all year and only lost by 4.no one has mentioned the bad coaching job by willard.joe has issues in real time basketball.he done it last year against Coldwater.majority of teams that make it to districts and beyond have at least one if not two really good shooters.cc had one but he waited til the kid made 4 threes before he decided to get a guy glued to him.cc coach came out with a triangle and 2.didnt want tb or cp to beat them. Well damn that's smart! Coaches didn't know what to do and obviously didn't game plan for it.why not?I mentioned early in the year that a triangle and two would cause major problems for us.coach grey used it against us but it looked like we were ready for it.im still scratching my head over the last 25 seconds.i understand the philosophy but don't agree with it at all.cc was on their heels then that...all we had to do is try to steal the ball and or foul.what a mess.i had concerns last year about in game coaching and caught total hell for it but that's ok.when it comes to a big game and big moments I just don't think we have a big time coach.easy to coach when your up a bunch.cc coach had a great game plan and it showed. I love that you aren't afraid of the backlash and always speak your mind, not too many would have the b's to do this. Watching OG and CC last night it is clear OG is on another level. They are obviously one of the premier programs in DIII in the state. They toyed with CC and easily beat them by 30+. It has been fun to watch Willard over the last few years but we'll fall on some tough times over the next few years. Give CC the credit, they scouted Willard well and had the perfect game plan and executed to perfection. Not sure where Willard's scoring is coming from next year but some are predicting them to challenge for the Bay, that will be a tough order. I think Willard will be back in a similar situation they were in his first year here, rebuilding years. there's a lot of good things Joe and hirsh does with these kids.a lot.but when it comes to real time decisions and adjustments I'm not a fan .I'm not bashing them I'm just calling it like I see it.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 12, 2020 9:15:28 GMT -5
No, that's not what I said, and I'm not sure of the relevance of your last sentence. I certainly expect every team to get better. My comments were strictly based on the talent level and experience of the underclassmen of the teams we played this year. I agree with c5.just like any other school losing their studs someone else has to step up .the 55 percent of shots taken by cp and tb will be distributed through someone else.who will that be? I'm guessing trey and myles.and that's where the shots should come from.now...can trey and Myles handle the pressure of being the go 2 guy's?I think so but only time will tell.i heard trey is playing aau with tnba which is a high caliber aau program.myles is playing with Ohio hoops.not to sure about that program . their the only two kids that I know of that are playing aau. The way I read the post was 35% and 25%. TNBA is a national franchise that has local branches. This makes them well known but overall they have many mid level and low level teams that pay for the high caliber teams that travel the country for tournaments. Somebody will step up, there is no doubt in my mind your coaches will find someone. Like other schools will.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Mar 12, 2020 9:31:08 GMT -5
I agree with c5.just like any other school losing their studs someone else has to step up .the 55 percent of shots taken by cp and tb will be distributed through someone else.who will that be? I'm guessing trey and myles.and that's where the shots should come from.now...can trey and Myles handle the pressure of being the go 2 guy's?I think so but only time will tell.i heard trey is playing aau with tnba which is a high caliber aau program.myles is playing with Ohio hoops.not to sure about that program . their the only two kids that I know of that are playing aau. The way I read the post was 35% and 25%. TNBA is a national franchise that has local branches. This makes them well known but overall they have many mid level and low level teams that pay for the high caliber teams that travel the country for tournaments. Somebody will step up, there is no doubt in my mind your coaches will find someone. Like other schools will. Hate to keep questioning what you say (not really 😁), but like many national franchise programs, the mid & lower level teams typically play local tournaments...Cleveland/Columbus/etc. The higher level teams play some local tourneys as well, but travel to Pittsburgh, Louisville, Spookynook/Manheim, Atlantic City, etc....where the mid/lower level teams do not.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 12, 2020 9:59:39 GMT -5
As has been pointed out, replacing 40 points a game will be a challenge. Replacing the lost rebounds and intimidation of 6-8 is more difficult. Working on shooting in the off season can help solve the 40 points, but nothing replaces size other than more of it in the pipe line. The surest way to minimize the loss of the the seniors is to change philosophies. Shot selection and patience on offense will minimize the loss of 40 points. More depth is easier to find than 40 points and lost rebounds. 8 players playing tough man defense is easier to develop. Fans might not like it, but the philosophy of playing to win games in the 40s mitigates the loss of scoring and size.
At the high school level, coaches have to work with who comes out for sports. Good coaches will adapt to fit the needs.
|
|
|
Post by truecrimson on Mar 12, 2020 10:52:03 GMT -5
My prediction is valid until proven otherwise. I hope they do have kids stepping into these positions lost by graduation and do great. 40 points a game is the bigger number, not the 60% shots taken. Of those 60% shots taken by these two they hit 60%+ of their shots while others hit much much less % wise. Leadership is also an unknown so yes, I believe Willard will be in the same situation they were in during Joe's first year. time will tell. First, I'm not begrudging the 60% of the shots taken by the 2 Seniors. They were the only 2 proven scorers we had. Secondly, a prediction is just an opinion. Your entitled to yours, as I am mine. Validity for either is meaningless. Lastly, if either one of those Seniors came close to making 60% of their shots, they both would be 1st team all ohioans and up for state player of the year. You're about 20% off. 60% shooting, especially from the perimeter, is almost unheard of. I stand corrected: 2 pt FG% Weiss 48% Paxton 40% Baldridge 53% Adelman 45% Pinkston 59% Dawson 50% Parrott 43% Cok 47% 3 pt FG% Weiss 0% Paxton 31% Baldridge 30% Adelman 0% Pinkston 20% Dawson 29% Parrott 35% Cok 42%
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 12, 2020 10:56:20 GMT -5
The way I read the post was 35% and 25%. TNBA is a national franchise that has local branches. This makes them well known but overall they have many mid level and low level teams that pay for the high caliber teams that travel the country for tournaments. Somebody will step up, there is no doubt in my mind your coaches will find someone. Like other schools will. Hate to keep questioning what you say (not really 😁), but like many national franchise programs, the mid & lower level teams typically play local tournaments...Cleveland/Columbus/etc. The higher level teams play some local tourneys as well, but travel to Pittsburgh, Louisville, Spookynook/Manheim, Atlantic City, etc....where the mid/lower level teams do not. That is what I was saying. The higher levels travel. And some times their travels are to tournaments that are hosted or ran by another TNBA branch. Bottom line just playing for TNBA could mean you wrote a check. the goal for any AAU player should be getting better and that can be done locally if you work hard enough.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 12, 2020 11:11:30 GMT -5
First, I'm not begrudging the 60% of the shots taken by the 2 Seniors. They were the only 2 proven scorers we had. Secondly, a prediction is just an opinion. Your entitled to yours, as I am mine. Validity for either is meaningless. Lastly, if either one of those Seniors came close to making 60% of their shots, they both would be 1st team all ohioans and up for state player of the year. You're about 20% off. 60% shooting, especially from the perimeter, is almost unheard of. I stand corrected: 2 pt FG% Weiss 48% Paxton 40% Baldridge 53% Adelman 45% Pinkston 59% Dawson 50% Parrott 43% Cok 47% 3 pt FG% Weiss 0% Paxton 31% Baldridge 30% Adelman 0% Pinkston 20% Dawson 29% Parrott 35% Cok 42% Percentages can tell the story but are more accurate of the kids are taking a similar amount of shots. Shooting 30% on 120 attempts is a little different than shooting 48% on 18 shots. From the numbers above, it would appear that Willard returns some shooters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2020 16:29:59 GMT -5
I think the OHSAA should award Willard, The People's State Championship, For '19-'20.
|
|
|
Post by buckeyekid on Mar 13, 2020 16:47:48 GMT -5
I vote OG
|
|
|
Post by xlegend on Mar 14, 2020 5:53:26 GMT -5
I agree with c5.just like any other school losing their studs someone else has to step up .the 55 percent of shots taken by cp and tb will be distributed through someone else.who will that be? I'm guessing trey and myles.and that's where the shots should come from.now...can trey and Myles handle the pressure of being the go 2 guy's?I think so but only time will tell.i heard trey is playing aau with tnba which is a high caliber aau program.myles is playing with Ohio hoops.not to sure about that program . their the only two kids that I know of that are playing aau. The way I read the post was 35% and 25%. TNBA is a national franchise that has local branches. This makes them well known but overall they have many mid level and low level teams that pay for the high caliber teams that travel the country for tournaments. Somebody will step up, there is no doubt in my mind your coaches will find someone. Like other schools will. disagree somewhat. Tb and cp played for tnba last year. Yes they start out local but then they really ramp up the big time tournaments.great competition. There's a lot of travel and yes money but at the end of the day if your kid gets noticed and offered it's worth it.this is how you get your name out there.its not the only avenue but it sure does help.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 14, 2020 8:54:53 GMT -5
The way I read the post was 35% and 25%. TNBA is a national franchise that has local branches. This makes them well known but overall they have many mid level and low level teams that pay for the high caliber teams that travel the country for tournaments. Somebody will step up, there is no doubt in my mind your coaches will find someone. Like other schools will. disagree somewhat. Tb and cp played for tnba last year. Yes they start out local but then they really ramp up the big time tournaments.great competition. There's a lot of travel and yes money but at the end of the day if your kid gets noticed and offered it's worth it.this is how you get your name out there.its not the only avenue but it sure does help. Has TB and CP received any offers at this point?
|
|
|
Post by ronburgandy on Mar 16, 2020 15:06:06 GMT -5
Cooper Parrott was named 1st team All Ohio Division 3 today and Terry Baldridge was 3rd team.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 22, 2020 7:17:04 GMT -5
I would have rather Willard won another District Title than lose to CC, but imagine if Willard had won the District and then upset O-G. We would have been thinking, "we just took out the favorites to win State (O-G) a State Title is definitely a possibility now." Then we would have watched the tournament get cancelled. So I'm glad Willard lost and wasn't sitting there like a lot of those other schools wondering if they would have won State in 2020.
|
|
|
Post by buckeyekid on Mar 22, 2020 8:23:51 GMT -5
Horrendous decision to cancel all this stuff. Take the fans in person out completely. Each school gets 25 people in the gym--that includes the players and coaches and the handful of whoever. Put all the games on live TV easily for people to watch via live stream or TV.
2 teams I feel sorry for are the Lucas boys,,,and the Napoleon girls.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 22, 2020 10:00:29 GMT -5
Horrendous decision to cancel all this stuff. Take the fans in person out completely. Each school gets 25 people in the gym--that includes the players and coaches and the handful of whoever. Put all the games on live TV easily for people to watch via live stream or TV. 2 teams I feel sorry for are the Lucas boys,,,and the Napoleon girls. Feel terrible for these kids and fans but I think it was the correct action to take. There is little chance you could have any thing below 100 people to be able to play a state tournament. Building staff alone could make up more bodies than each team brings. I love and enjoy my high school sports but when dealing with something that is killing people and shutting down entire states, I'm ok with not putting additional lives at risk of sickness. But it does give us something to talk about.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 22, 2020 16:15:01 GMT -5
3 deaths in Ohio in 4 weeks. Better chance of getting killed in a car driving to the game,,as morbid as that sounds. 1-5% can catch it from another person who has it. This is ridiculous,,,as far as Ohio goes. And,,,people need to quit acting like it's dead man walking if you get it, which you 95%--99% won't. Please do not act like the death totals are the only number that matters if you haven't spoken to someone who has a parent isolated in a hospital on a ventilator.
|
|
|
Post by buckeyekid on Mar 22, 2020 16:28:51 GMT -5
I have a father isolated in a rest home,,ya I totally get it.
I'm looking at stats that's all. Not making light of any death-- As it pertains to what we've done about it---over the top . SMH.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 22, 2020 17:15:35 GMT -5
I have a father isolated in a rest home,,ya I totally get it. I'm looking at stats that's all. Not making light of any death-- As it pertains to what we've done about it---over the top . SMH. Is it possible the stats are low in Ohio because of what has been done. I look at the precautions we have taken in Ohio and the numbers have continued to climb. Could you imagine if we would have schools open and sports still being played for an additional 10 days with large gatherings. Also the first case in Ohio was announced on March 9. So it has been just under 2 weeks if that report is correct. We now have 351 confirmed.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 22, 2020 19:01:52 GMT -5
I'll let you have your opinion. HA HA HA, Thank you so much for allowing me to have my opinion. But I thought we were discussing stats
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 22, 2020 21:54:54 GMT -5
3 deaths in Ohio in 4 weeks. Better chance of getting killed in a car driving to the game,,as morbid as that sounds. 1-5% can catch it from another person who has it. This is ridiculous,,,as far as Ohio goes. And,,,people need to quit acting like it's dead man walking if you get it, which you 95%--99% won't. What till the kids get back from Spring break that slept 10 to a room and exchanged spit and other bodily fluids
|
|