|
Post by rywill4 on Dec 27, 2019 19:13:03 GMT -5
And to the fake so called bright one again you can recruit players academically too your school wink wink duh that's recruiting right.. Lol that was my original stance private schools recruit players based on free tuition and a good education.. Yes there maybe some public schools with open enrollment who entice kids with academics those schools are far fewer than what private schools do regarding recruiting kids with tuition and free education the bases of my point is recruiting is going on
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Dec 28, 2019 1:29:44 GMT -5
Go back and look at your post on this thread from Dec. 14 2019 at 2:03pm, where you said, "As far as competitive balance, not to familiar with how system works." Were you being untruthful THEN or NOW when you said, "I am knowledgeable of competitive balance, you habe[sic] not enlightened me on anything."
I'm not worried about Rogers. I have never in my life thought about Rogers until YOU mentioned the school in your first post on this thread and ALSO used the word RECRUIT in connection with Rogers.
Your comprehension level is very low. THREE TIMES I have stated the FACT that ONLY the OHSAA can investigate infractions.
Your intellect level is very low. When a school "brings together a collection of talent" from outside their school system it MUST BE illegal, READ THE OHSAA BYLAWS. Any school that facilitates "adding new players" are CHEATING. READ the OHSAA Bylaws. Again, maybe you lack knowledge in the written word and your use of phrases such as "bringing together" and "adding talent" is a misnomer.
There are OHSAA rules for a reason. If you don't care that those rules are broken. Then you don't care if life rules and laws are broken. You and those of your ilk are a detriment to society.
Now that you look bad, all of a sudden you change your tune and in your latest post you only want to talk big schools that have success. BTW Akron SV is not a big school.
You are further showing a lack of intellect. My statement about Moeller is 100% accurate. AGAIN I was pointing out how even a VERY small recruiting violation is noticed by the OHSAA and dealt with accordingly.
AGAIN, I care not about CB. The ONLY reason I delved into the subject was to educate you, when you told us you "were not to familiar with how it worked".
Not only are you lacking in facts and details, but your grammar, spelling, vocabulary, punctuation, syntax and run on blathering makes it next to impossible to understand what you're talking about and embarrassing for you.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Dec 28, 2019 1:31:28 GMT -5
And to the fake so called bright one again you can recruit players academically too your school wink wink duh that's recruiting right.. Lol that was my original stance private schools recruit players based on free tuition and a good education.. Yes there maybe some public schools with open enrollment who entice kids with academics those schools are far fewer than what private schools do regarding recruiting kids with tuition and free education the bases of my point is recruiting is going on What a doofus.
|
|
|
Post by jmorgret07 on Jan 6, 2020 12:26:31 GMT -5
1. Rogers 2. Sandusky 3. Rossford 4. Oak Harbor 5. Clyde 6. Columbian 7. Perkins 8. Bellevue 9. Woodward 10. Maumee 11. Scott 12. Port Clinton
|
|
|
Post by koko86 on Jan 7, 2020 9:10:03 GMT -5
rywill4 ... you are not making a whole lot of sense. Thank you Willard Fillmore for the proper education.
|
|
|
Post by rywill4 on Jan 7, 2020 11:23:38 GMT -5
Everything I stated made perfect sense if you read my posts everything made perfect sense.. If it doesn't make sense too you and went over your head then you being in tune with the landscape of youth basketball is misguided and lacks proper education and to Willard Fillmore I'm not even going too entertain someone like you.. you speakt like this is a English 101 ccourse this is a sports forum come again my man lol then you want too slang insults that just truly shows your intellect and what type a person you are.. you can speak factually on any manner you want too state your case with proper English and grammatical errors like get real.. You never fully addressed my position on manner.. Again you can have it lol because the heavy hitters I deal with involving youth basketball know the landscape of the game facts!! So I don't have too keep explaining my stance on situation bc nothing I initially stated about Toledo Rogers whether you agree or disagree calls for a back and forth but again I wish Toledo Rogers the best and I hope they accomplish everything they set out too accomplish thia season
|
|
marchmadness
All Conference
2021 Playoff Pick'em Champion
Posts: 322
|
Post by marchmadness on Jan 7, 2020 12:01:44 GMT -5
6 of the 12 teams in this district are just simply not good. Perkins, Bellevue, Woodward, Scott, Maumee and PC. However Rogers and Sandusky may be better than anyone in the Ashland district. I'd rank them like this in terms of power.
Rogers Sandusky
Oak Harbor Rossford Clyde Columbian
Woodward Scott Perkins Bellevue Maumee PC
Those middle four teams (especially the 5 and 6 seeds) have an interesting choice. All play each other (3, 4, 5 and 6) in sectionals and avoid the Rogers/Sandusky until Districts, or take an easy game in sectional semis and play one of the big 2 in sectional finals.
|
|
|
Post by smitty1974 on Jan 10, 2020 0:52:30 GMT -5
i totally agree withn you josh.especially with rossford at 3 over oak harbor,and rossford coming off a win over eastwood and blowing out fostoria earlier this season. i noticed on davey1 that rossfords first 12 games on road and then 8 games at owens cc then the last 2 at home. then later on at owens cc rossford has wauseon on january 25th,on january 31 at owens, rossford vs fostoria then on february 7th and 8th at owens rossford has eastwood and toledo rogers back to back and well see how good rossford is.
|
|
|
Post by jmorgret07 on Jan 13, 2020 9:38:15 GMT -5
1. Rogers 2. Sandusky 3. Rossford 4. Oak Harbor 5. Clyde 6. Columbian 7. Perkins 8. Woodward 9. Bellevue 10. Maumee 11. Scott 12. Port Clinton
|
|
|
Post by koko86 on Jan 15, 2020 10:56:11 GMT -5
It will be very interesting to see how this district plays out. Will be a fun one to watch.
|
|
|
Post by jmorgret07 on Jan 15, 2020 12:55:39 GMT -5
It will be very interesting to see how this district plays out. Will be a fun one to watch. Tournament draw is February 9th...
Rogers at Sandusky on February 15th...
|
|
|
Post by edchambers on Jan 16, 2020 14:50:53 GMT -5
Should have a good idea about Oak Harbor in the next couple of weeks. The Rockets go to Cardinal Stritch this Saturday. The Cardinals don't have their 6'7' starting post, a transfer from Whitmer, for the rest of the season. After Stritch, the Rockets have Willard twice (1/24 & 1/31) and Eastwood in a span of 9 days
|
|
|
Post by jmorgret07 on Jan 23, 2020 10:21:17 GMT -5
1. Rogers 2. Sandusky 3. Rossford 4. Oak Harbor 5. Columbian 6. Clyde 7. Woodward 8. Perkins 9. Bellevue 10. Maumee 11. Scott 12. Port Clinton
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Feb 8, 2020 15:52:06 GMT -5
Wouldn’t surprise me if Sandusky beats Rogers (reg season) not sure why they are ranked #2. Either District this one or Mansfield will have an uphill battle to beat Shawnee who beat Lima, OG and Findlay recently.
|
|
|
Post by edchambers on Feb 8, 2020 16:11:51 GMT -5
Have you watched Rogers or comparing scores?
|
|
|
Post by streak05 on Feb 8, 2020 16:55:54 GMT -5
Wouldn’t surprise me if Sandusky beats Rogers (reg season) not sure why they are ranked #2. Either District this one or Mansfield will have an uphill battle to beat Shawnee who beat Lima, OG and Findlay recently. Are you serious? Lol. Rogers will beat Sandusky by 20
|
|
|
Post by maplecityjake on Feb 8, 2020 18:07:48 GMT -5
The only way Sandusky beats Rogers is Streak05, Streaknation, and Rywill4 pay off the Refs. Here's hoping for deep pockets.
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Feb 8, 2020 18:16:08 GMT -5
Make the case that they are 20 points better than Sandusky I’m just looking at the fact they lost to a good Lima team ( Shawnee beat them by double digits) they lost to St X a decent D1 team. What are their signature wins???
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Feb 8, 2020 18:24:58 GMT -5
In fact they beat Bowsher by 7 last night and Bowsher lost to Clyde a week earlier by 10. Give me Sandusky and 20 and I’m good...
|
|
|
Post by maplecityjake on Feb 8, 2020 21:48:31 GMT -5
Make the case that they are 20 points better than Sandusky I’m just looking at the fact they lost to a good Lima team ( Shawnee beat them by double digits) they lost to St X a decent D1 team. What are their signature wins??? Beat Start both times, and Rossford.
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Feb 8, 2020 21:55:23 GMT -5
The Rossford game was today good win don’t know much about Start I’m still taking Sandusky and the points
|
|
|
Post by maplecityjake on Feb 8, 2020 22:18:20 GMT -5
Start is 15-3 and was a Regional team last year. Rogers hammered them both times.
|
|
|
Post by streak05 on Feb 8, 2020 22:54:26 GMT -5
If the Sandusky team that played quarters 1-3 against Norwalk shows up against Rogers it’ll be a 84-56 type of beat down
|
|
Nashville Buckeye
All City
Ohio to Georgia to Nashville.. But always a Buckeye!
Posts: 76
|
Post by Nashville Buckeye on Feb 9, 2020 5:31:14 GMT -5
Start is 15-3 and was a Regional team last year. Rogers hammered them both times. I'm not a believer too much in the last year argument. Its 15-17 year old kids. I just think last year has no bearing on this year. In some cases it matters, but too many variables between one year to the next to get an accurate comparison.
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Feb 9, 2020 7:38:33 GMT -5
If the Sandusky team that played quarters 1-3 against Norwalk shows up against Rogers it’ll be a 84-56 type of beat down Look nobody said Sandusky was going to win this game however if it were to happen it wouldn’t be like Margaretta beating Willard for instance. I would still take Sandusky plus 20 all day
|
|
|
Post by Highlander29 on Feb 9, 2020 15:13:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Feb 9, 2020 15:17:18 GMT -5
I like Sanduskys draw Rossford for the right to play for a district title
|
|
|
Post by sportsvideo on Feb 9, 2020 15:18:00 GMT -5
If the Sandusky team that played quarters 1-3 against Norwalk shows up against Rogers it’ll be a 84-56 type of beat down Look nobody said Sandusky was going to win this game however if it were to happen it wouldn’t be like Margaretta beating Willard for instance. I would still take Sandusky plus 20 all day looking at this bracket... Rossford vs Oak harbor winner likely to face Sandusky... im going with rossford / rogers DF
|
|
|
Post by portwalk on Feb 9, 2020 15:20:02 GMT -5
Look nobody said Sandusky was going to win this game however if it were to happen it wouldn’t be like Margaretta beating Willard for instance. I would still take Sandusky plus 20 all day looking at this bracket... Rossford vs Oak harbor winner likely to face Sandusky... im going with rossford / rogers DF Didn’t see OH there you gotta route for the SBC go Rockets
|
|
|
Post by xlegend on Feb 9, 2020 15:22:39 GMT -5
looking at this bracket... Rossford vs Oak harbor winner likely to face Sandusky... im going with rossford / rogers DF Didn’t see OH there you gotta route for the SBC go Rockets I like oak harbor as well. They play good defense and take good shots .
|
|