|
Post by portwalk on Mar 4, 2020 16:06:28 GMT -5
Come on dude. IF Marg played Willard 10 times how many games does Marg win? One or two? I would say 0 but they already got 1...
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 4, 2020 16:18:01 GMT -5
On any night a team can play above themselves are below themselves. Because a good team lost does not take credit away from the winning team. Some teams play bad because of the team they are playing. Fans say "we didn't shoot the ball well tonight" but when the other team has a hand in your face and out rebounding you, that makes it tough. Come on Ron, you know this stuff. Willard is better than Margaretta and that one game was a fluke, anyone can see that. Stop trying to crap on willard all the time. Never look to crap on Willard but I do try always to be realistic in my thoughts and when a team wins as the favorite or the underdog, I feel it is because of something they did well. Teams typically do not shoot well because they are well defended. Players have bad shooting nights. All I was saying is even a average team can put a good game plan together and beat a team. But I have seen CC play a few times this year and in no way do I see them as world beaters that should not have lost 3 games. In fact they had a few games that were very close. Bottom line, it's possible Willard lost to a team that maybe they shouldn't have, but that should not be reflected negatively on CC. Give them credit for a solid game plan. From the highlights I saw, I will ask if Willard plays defense though?
|
|
|
Post by buckeyekid on Mar 4, 2020 16:50:30 GMT -5
I just watched the highlights. As I sit here now,, I don't for one second think that CC was an inferior team. In a lot of ways they were superior going in. One player better imo. Rebounding and playing good sound man to man defense being two right off the bat. Their big guys were the difference as they made 3's and tough inside looks. This was a veteran CC team . They made big shots when they needed to. Flashes were a possession and a timeout away from a tie and overtime.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Mar 4, 2020 21:15:20 GMT -5
Willard is better than Margaretta and that one game was a fluke, anyone can see that. Stop trying to crap on willard all the time. Never look to crap on Willard but I do try always to be realistic in my thoughts and when a team wins as the favorite or the underdog, I feel it is because of something they did well. Teams typically do not shoot well because they are well defended. Players have bad shooting nights. All I was saying is even a average team can put a good game plan together and beat a team. But I have seen CC play a few times this year and in no way do I see them as world beaters that should not have lost 3 games. In fact they had a few games that were very close. Bottom line, it's possible Willard lost to a team that maybe they shouldn't have, but that should not be reflected negatively on CC. Give them credit for a solid game plan. From the highlights I saw, I will ask if Willard plays defense though? Willard learns to play zone in 7th through 9th. They play a solid 1-3-1 trapping zone
|
|
|
Post by dude on Mar 4, 2020 21:39:02 GMT -5
I just watched the highlights. As I sit here now,, I don't for one second think that CC was an inferior team. In a lot of ways they were superior going in. One player better imo. Rebounding and playing good sound man to man defense being two right off the bat. Their big guys were the difference as they made 3's and tough inside looks. This was a veteran CC team . They made big shots when they needed to. Flashes were a possession and a timeout away from a tie and overtime. Well 13 coaches in this district felt that CC was inferior as Willard was the #1 seed and CC was the #3 seed.
|
|