|
MOAC 22-23
Jul 23, 2022 22:49:19 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by 4 on Jul 23, 2022 22:49:19 GMT -5
Starting a threat for next basketball season.
Latest news I’ve seen is Shelby’s Bruskotter has two D1 offers now, Akron and Toledo.
|
|
|
MOAC 22-23
Jul 23, 2022 22:50:11 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by 4 on Jul 23, 2022 22:50:11 GMT -5
He and River Valleys 2/3 will be very very good in the league the next two years. 1 and 2 best players in league, I’ll say Harding has the third with Marquis Long.
|
|
|
MOAC 22-23
Aug 11, 2022 13:36:17 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by baldref on Aug 11, 2022 13:36:17 GMT -5
Mike Delaney new head coach at highland per reports
|
|
|
Post by dude on Aug 15, 2022 17:08:35 GMT -5
Mike Delaney new head coach at highland per reports Confirmed.
|
|
|
Post by 419bossman on Oct 26, 2022 20:31:31 GMT -5
This is what I think the MOAC will go this year
1. Shelby 2. River Valley 3. Marion Harding 4. Marion Pleasant 5. Galion 6. Ontario 7. Highland 8. Clear Fork
|
|
|
MOAC 22-23
Oct 28, 2022 22:01:05 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by moacpops on Oct 28, 2022 22:01:05 GMT -5
This is what I think the MOAC will go this year 1. Shelby 2. River Valley 3. Marion Harding 4. Marion Pleasant 5. Galion 6. Ontario 7. Highland 8. Clear Fork I’ll go with 1. Shelby & River Valley (Tie for 1st. Beat everyone. Split with each other) 3. Marion Harding 4. Ontario 5. Pleasant 6. Galion 7. Highland 8. Clear Fork Predict it will be like football where the postseason is miserable for MOAC against non-conference teams.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Oct 30, 2022 10:43:27 GMT -5
This is what I think the MOAC will go this year 1. Shelby 2. River Valley 3. Marion Harding 4. Marion Pleasant 5. Galion 6. Ontario 7. Highland 8. Clear Fork 1. Shelby - very talented group should be at the top 2. River Valley - Some talent and demanding coach could put them in top spot 3. Marion Harding - Always unknowns but they could get some upsets 4. Marion Pleasant - This may be a little high for them but they gained a bunch of experience last season. 5. Galion - good offer season, coach is dedicated, could move up 6. Ontario - May be a high prediction 7. Highland - New Coach with loads of experience and good results 8. Clear Fork - New Coach with no experience
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Oct 30, 2022 20:21:01 GMT -5
Ontario hasn't had basketball for centuries. Why so much hate? Did Mergel take you to the shed in a game of horse?
I see Dudette reconsidered and edited his post. Allow me to remind what he said. He said Ontario would have their worst record in centuries because of their coach. Thus my post above. I will allow another of his transgressions. I hear he has a problem, which he can't control.
|
|
|
Post by moacpops on Oct 31, 2022 8:15:50 GMT -5
This is what I think the MOAC will go this year 1. Shelby 2. River Valley 3. Marion Harding 4. Marion Pleasant 5. Galion 6. Ontario 7. Highland 8. Clear Fork 1. Shelby - very talented group should be at the top 2. River Valley - Some talent and demanding coach could put them in top spot 3. Marion Harding - Always unknowns but they could get some upsets 4. Marion Pleasant - This may be a little high for them but they gained a bunch of experience last season. 5. Galion - good offer season, coach is dedicated, could move up 6. Ontario - May be a high prediction 7. Highland - New Coach with loads of experience and good results 8. Clear Fork - New Coach with no experience I respectfully disagree. Bruskotter is outstanding with a solid supporting cast but RV has more talent on the roster than Shelby. The Smith kid at R Valley is the best overall player in the conference IMO. Both the Whippets and Vikings will have many wins in the MOAC by 20+ points. It will be a boring year for MOAC hoops.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Oct 31, 2022 8:35:50 GMT -5
1. Shelby - very talented group should be at the top 2. River Valley - Some talent and demanding coach could put them in top spot 3. Marion Harding - Always unknowns but they could get some upsets 4. Marion Pleasant - This may be a little high for them but they gained a bunch of experience last season. 5. Galion - good offer season, coach is dedicated, could move up 6. Ontario - May be a high prediction 7. Highland - New Coach with loads of experience and good results 8. Clear Fork - New Coach with no experience I respectfully disagree. Bruskotter is outstanding with a solid supporting cast but RV has more talent on the roster than Shelby. The Smith kid at R Valley is the best overall player in the conference IMO. Both the Whippets and Vikings will have many wins in the MOAC by 20+ points. It will be a boring year for MOAC hoops. It's great to have differences of opinion and you may end up being correct. Smith is good and has some talent around him. AS I said I think Shelby should be at the top but RV definitely could be MOAC Champ.
|
|
|
Post by moacpops on Oct 31, 2022 9:26:50 GMT -5
I agree. Good banter is fun. The two Shelby vs R Valley gamss will be the MOAC games of the year. The others not so much.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Oct 31, 2022 14:33:17 GMT -5
1. Shelby - very talented group should be at the top 2. River Valley - Some talent and demanding coach could put them in top spot 3. Marion Harding - Always unknowns but they could get some upsets 4. Marion Pleasant - This may be a little high for them but they gained a bunch of experience last season. 5. Galion - good offer season, coach is dedicated, could move up 6. Ontario - May be a high prediction 7. Highland - New Coach with loads of experience and good results 8. Clear Fork - New Coach with no experience I respectfully disagree. Bruskotter is outstanding with a solid supporting cast but RV has more talent on the roster than Shelby. The Smith kid at R Valley is the best overall player in the conference IMO. Both the Whippets and Vikings will have many wins in the MOAC by 20+ points. It will be a boring year for MOAC hoops. Smith must have several DI offers then, give us the details
|
|
|
Post by dude on Oct 31, 2022 20:51:30 GMT -5
I agree. Good banter is fun. The two Shelby vs R Valley gamss will be the MOAC games of the year. The others not so much. Nice when you can disagree and have a debate without insults or degrading comments. I agree the rest of the MOAC is a step behind. I think Galion could take a step forward as well as Harding. Both in their 2nd year with coaches. I also think Highland could have a better season this year with the experienced coach they hired.
|
|
|
Post by moacpops on Oct 31, 2022 23:00:25 GMT -5
I respectfully disagree. Bruskotter is outstanding with a solid supporting cast but RV has more talent on the roster than Shelby. The Smith kid at R Valley is the best overall player in the conference IMO. Both the Whippets and Vikings will have many wins in the MOAC by 20+ points. It will be a boring year for MOAC hoops. Smith must have several DI offers then, give us the details I am not bashing Bruskotter - I said he was outstanding. College offers don't necessarily mean one player is better than another.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Nov 1, 2022 3:43:07 GMT -5
Smith must have several DI offers then, give us the details I am not bashing Bruskotter - I said he was outstanding. College offers don't necessarily mean one player is better than another. Wasn't the same thing discussed last season with two CC players. One had college offers and the other was just a better high school player.
|
|
|
Post by fanofthegame on Nov 1, 2022 5:01:56 GMT -5
I suppose you could make an argument that someone is better at the level they are playing, but not built for the next level. Tebow is a good example. He was a Heisman trophy winner, but his style wasn’t suited to the next level. What makes a good high school basketball player is a little different than a college player, but it hard to argue that a kid that already had division one offers isn’t a better basketball player than one who does not.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Nov 1, 2022 5:30:54 GMT -5
I suppose you could make an argument that someone is better at the level they are playing, but not built for the next level. Tebow is a good example. He was a Heisman trophy winner, but his style wasn’t suited to the next level. What makes a good high school basketball player is a little different than a college player, but it hard to argue that a kid that already had division one offers isn’t a better basketball player than one who does not. Physical measurements factor into this. In the CC scenario, the offered player was 6'5 while the player who received more awards and honors was pushing 6'0.
|
|
|
Post by fanofthegame on Nov 1, 2022 7:01:43 GMT -5
I suppose you could make an argument that someone is better at the level they are playing, but not built for the next level. Tebow is a good example. He was a Heisman trophy winner, but his style wasn’t suited to the next level. What makes a good high school basketball player is a little different than a college player, but it hard to argue that a kid that already had division one offers isn’t a better basketball player than one who does not. Physical measurements factor into this. In the CC scenario, the offered player was 6'5 while the player who received more awards and honors was pushing 6'0. Agreed. When the talent is more dilute things like being a little shorter or a little slower don’t stand out as much. When the competition and talent level rise inches shorter and steps slower mean a lot more. But in the end those things mean something or the people who get paid to offer scholarships wouldn’t care about them. I think their opinion means a little more than a bunch of yahoos on a message board (me included).
|
|
|
Post by fanofthegame on Nov 1, 2022 7:11:21 GMT -5
And in the end it’s a team sport. A kid might stand out and be more important to his team while a better player might be surrounded by more talent and not appear to stand out as much. They are also being coached by high school coaches who may not be able to strategize as well and game plan against a given player allowing an inferior player to look better than he is. There are a lot of factors. Again, at the end of the day a professional is offering money to one player and not another and that means something.
|
|
|
Post by dude on Nov 1, 2022 8:17:15 GMT -5
Physical measurements factor into this. In the CC scenario, the offered player was 6'5 while the player who received more awards and honors was pushing 6'0. Agreed. When the talent is more dilute things like being a little shorter or a little slower don’t stand out as much. When the competition and talent level rise inches shorter and steps slower mean a lot more. But in the end those things mean something or the people who get paid to offer scholarships wouldn’t care about them. I think their opinion means a little more than a bunch of yahoos on a message board (me included). I was not trying to point out you being incorrect. I was only showing that the smaller player I referenced from last year was seen as much more valuable( by many who voted and presented awards) while the taller player had more potential at the next level
|
|
|
Post by dude on Nov 1, 2022 8:22:49 GMT -5
And in the end it’s a team sport. A kid might stand out and be more important to his team while a better player might be surrounded by more talent and not appear to stand out as much. They are also being coached by high school coaches who may not be able to strategize as well and game plan against a given player allowing an inferior player to look better than he is. There are a lot of factors. Again, at the end of the day a professional is offering money to one player and not another and that means something. To my knowledge the Shelby kid has 6 offers with 5 being D1 and the other D2. Most are considered to have medium interest and primarily on potential as he still has 2 years of high school to play and develop. IF the two top players cancel each other out, the supporting cast will determine these games. I think the RV coaching has an advantage.
|
|
|
Post by 419bossman on Nov 8, 2022 16:01:08 GMT -5
Any word on how teams are doing with their scrimmages?
|
|
|
MOAC 22-23
Nov 12, 2022 22:25:06 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by whippetfan on Nov 12, 2022 22:25:06 GMT -5
Shelby went to a mega scrimmage at Lima Senior today. Played two quarters against three different teams. Heard they split against Dayton Chaminade-Julienne and Lima Senior. And won both quarters against Dayton Northmont. Playing in Tiffin this Thursday with Colombian and St.Mary’s Memorial who has OSU-commit Austin Parks.
|
|
|
Post by 419bossman on Nov 20, 2022 19:12:22 GMT -5
Welcome to opening Week. Here are the games for the Week of 11/21-11/26
Wednesday November 23rd Fairbanks at Marion Pleasant North Union at River Valley Galloway Westland at Marion Harding
Friday November 25th Lakewood at Highland Shelby at Madison
|
|
|
Post by 419bossman on Nov 21, 2022 11:38:54 GMT -5
Anyone know how each team has done in their scrimmages?
|
|
|
MOAC 22-23
Nov 24, 2022 17:57:15 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by 4 on Nov 24, 2022 17:57:15 GMT -5
Harding should be pretty good.
|
|
|
MOAC 22-23
Nov 24, 2022 19:45:57 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by 4 on Nov 24, 2022 19:45:57 GMT -5
Long is a good player. Freshman off the bench had 16. Seems like a player. Transfer from olentangy can really shoot it. Thomas worth. Transfer seems to be a good facilitator. Am RV transfer is long and athletic. Early takeaways
|
|
|
Post by awebgsu on Nov 25, 2022 9:39:40 GMT -5
Long is a good player. Freshman off the bench had 16. Seems like a player. Transfer from olentangy can really shoot it. Thomas worth. Transfer seems to be a good facilitator. Am RV transfer is long and athletic. Early takeaways Who are the actual transfers?
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Nov 25, 2022 14:44:38 GMT -5
Open enrollees must sit out the last half of the season. All other transfers must get approval from the OHSAA, to play in those games.
|
|
|
MOAC 22-23
Nov 25, 2022 20:06:03 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by 4 on Nov 25, 2022 20:06:03 GMT -5
not sure which term they are technically. i know a couple started attending during last school year.
|
|