|
|
Post by BellevueBuckeye on Sept 10, 2016 17:38:11 GMT -5
Shelby won last year 64-21
|
|
|
|
Post by greenman on Sept 10, 2016 20:19:35 GMT -5
It will be closer, but Whippets still take it.
|
|
|
|
Post by deathfromabove on Sept 11, 2016 13:36:41 GMT -5
Norwalk shock a lot of us last week but I still can not see them beating Shelby.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rambo McClain on Sept 13, 2016 6:05:34 GMT -5
This will be a battle, Norwalk pulls this out 22-21
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2016 7:33:04 GMT -5
Seeing both teams play I will say this is a Whippet win by multiple scores.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ramsfan09 on Sept 13, 2016 23:02:29 GMT -5
Lists last week was more about lex beating there selfs then Norwalk beating them. Come on lex out gained them like 240 yards to norwalks 50. This games over by half final 48-14
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Lex Fan on Sept 14, 2016 4:10:21 GMT -5
^^^I agee with the above statement. Shelby 42-7.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 6:28:03 GMT -5
Yep, running clock is in the game plan is my guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Sept 15, 2016 18:46:49 GMT -5
Should be a close game. Norwalk beat Lex by 2, Shelby beat Lex by a TD. However, possibly Shelby played bad against Lex and/or maybe Lex played poorly against Norwalk. Or none of the preceding means squat and it turns out as scooty suggests.
|
|
|
|
Post by footballer on Sept 16, 2016 9:56:43 GMT -5
I'm thinking something like 35-14 shelby
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 10:43:45 GMT -5
I will be at this game and provide scoring updates
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 18:20:33 GMT -5
6-0 Shelby, missed PAT...19.7 seconds 1st
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 18:24:13 GMT -5
6-0 Shelby, end of 1. Norwalk QB hasn't played since 2nd series...Norwalk punter has a leg!
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 18:32:26 GMT -5
9-0 Shelby, 9:01 2nd
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 18:44:31 GMT -5
9-7 Shelby, 4:58 2nd
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 18:51:15 GMT -5
15-7 Shelby, 4:04 2nd
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 19:00:46 GMT -5
15-15, 1:55 2nd. Backup QB doing well...
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 19:13:39 GMT -5
15-15 half. Norwalk game plan on both sides of the ball working well...
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 19:43:27 GMT -5
22-15 Shelby, 8:12 2nd
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 19:54:18 GMT -5
29-15 Shelby, 2:29 3rd
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 20:05:11 GMT -5
29-15 Shelby, end of 3
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 20:35:20 GMT -5
29-15 Shelby, final
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 16, 2016 20:36:38 GMT -5
Hats off to Norwalk, played a really good game...Shelby O-Line dominated the 2nd half. Shelby D better work on tackling if they want to have a shot next week...I would love to know the yardage Norwalk had after initial contact...it was a boat load...
|
|
|
|
Post by robinhood on Sept 16, 2016 21:10:18 GMT -5
I thought Norwalk played hard, just to much to overcome after starting qb went down with shoulder injury early in first quarter. I think Norwalk would of put up a lot of points on that defense. I cant see whippets hanging with sanduskys speed next week.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2016 21:45:15 GMT -5
Should be a close game. Norwalk beat Lex by 2, Shelby beat Lex by a TD. However, possibly Shelby played bad against Lex and/or maybe Lex played poorly against Norwalk. Or none of the preceding means squat and it turns out as scooty suggests. Lex lost to Shelby by 3. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2016 21:47:08 GMT -5
Norwalk shock a lot of us last week but I still can not see them beating Shelby. Sounds like Lexington is the one who shocked everyone last week. |
|
|
|
Post by deathfromabove on Sept 16, 2016 22:52:30 GMT -5
Scooter, you might be right. Either way, a lot of us picked Lex to win and we all got hurt.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2016 23:01:43 GMT -5
No doubt of that.
|
|
