|
|
Post by BellevueBuckeye on Sept 17, 2016 19:01:41 GMT -5
Sandusky won last year 41-28.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2016 5:40:53 GMT -5
I think this could be a classic. Shelby is the toughest place to play at in the conference, especially for Sandusky, as there has been some bad blood over the years at their place. Both teams have D1 prospect quarterbacks so it will come down to who out plays who and which team limits their turnovers. I would give Shelby the advantage on the O-line but I have been told that Shelby has struggled with tackling a bit which is not a good thing against sandusky running backs and receivers. The two sophmore running backs will be a key for Sandusky but I worry about them trying to fight for extra yards at times and fumbling. The game comes down to the kicker. 31-28 Sandusky.
|
|
|
|
Post by scout15 on Sept 19, 2016 11:19:01 GMT -5
Shelby has to be able to tackle in the open field. If Shelby can't contain the Sandusky athletes it could be a long night for them. Perkins has some decent athletes and Sandusky made them look like they were running in sand.
I think it comes down to mistakes/turnovers. If Sandusky plays a clean game I think they win.
|
|
|
|
Post by brutus036 on Sept 21, 2016 10:51:38 GMT -5
Shelby Has struggled ever since the Madison Game if they can find that game film and execute like the did that night they will win. Sandusky is the real deal and will test the Shelby Defense all night.
Home field is a nice advantage to have for this game. But I think that the Streaks will win this game in a close one
Sandusky 35
Shelby 31
|
|
|
|
Post by baldref on Sept 21, 2016 13:48:31 GMT -5
If all the computer and AP rankings are accurate, this should be an outstanding game. Think Sandusky's overall speed will pose big problems for Shelby's LB and defensive backs so I look for the streaks to win this one -- maybe by 10 or more points. Score should be similar to last year, IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Sept 21, 2016 16:24:26 GMT -5
AP #7 team in DIII VS AP #7 team in DIV
|
|
|
|
Post by ptangzoot on Sept 22, 2016 15:57:14 GMT -5
Heart tells me Shelby
Head keeps saying Sandusky
I am going with my heart here.
|
|
tori
All City
Posts: 51 
|
Post by tori on Sept 22, 2016 21:35:58 GMT -5
Sandusky in a shoot out .
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 22, 2016 21:58:00 GMT -5
I will be at this game and provide scoring updates
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2016 7:45:01 GMT -5
I always believe home field matters most in close games and I think this could be one. But this early Sandusky may have played the tougher schedule to get to 4-0. I'll say the Streaks get this one on the road.
|
|
|
|
Post by ptangzoot on Sept 23, 2016 8:23:34 GMT -5
Good Luck Whippets!!
|
|
j1120
All Block
Posts: 19
|
Post by j1120 on Sept 23, 2016 9:50:29 GMT -5
Usually Shelby seems to get off to slow starts, aside from the Lexington game. I think that will be the difference tonight, Sandusky will take the early lead but Shelby will make it interesting.
Sandusky 41
Shelby 35
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2016 12:40:37 GMT -5
I have absolutely no basis for this prediction and havent seen sandusky or shelby play in years, but I envision sandusky bringing 6 on D about every play and locking up straight man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ramsfan09 on Sept 23, 2016 15:09:56 GMT -5
35-14 Sandusky
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 18:14:16 GMT -5
7-0 Sandusky, 7:16 1st
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 18:22:14 GMT -5
14-0 Sandusky, 4:14 1st...not looking good whippet fans
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 18:34:15 GMT -5
21-0 Sandusky, 38.5 sec 1st
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 18:36:47 GMT -5
21-0 Sandusky, end of 1
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 18:59:41 GMT -5
28-0 Sandusky, 1:30 2nd. Sandusky putting on a clinic...Shelby laying an egg on both sides of the ball
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 19:09:44 GMT -5
28-0 Sandusky, half. Again, for those of u not here...Sandusky putting on a clinic both sides of the ball
|
|
|
|
Post by malone53 on Sept 23, 2016 19:11:08 GMT -5
Has Shelby had any positive progression
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 19:45:37 GMT -5
28-7 Sandusky, 7:16 3rd
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 19:51:00 GMT -5
35-7 Sandusky, 6:36 3rd
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 20:07:57 GMT -5
35-14 Sandusky, 6.5 seconds 3rd
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 20:10:54 GMT -5
35-14 Sandusky, end of 3
|
|
|
|
Post by xbellevueplayer on Sept 23, 2016 20:23:04 GMT -5
Cant anyone comment on what worked and what didnt for the whippets or maybe what shelby needed to do to play with the streaks? Sandusky play well in secondary?
|
|
|
|
Post by streak05 on Sept 23, 2016 20:29:17 GMT -5
Cant anyone comment on what worked and what didnt for the whippets or maybe what shelby needed to do to play with the streaks? Sandusky play well in secondary? Shelby didn't have the size or speed tonight. It's really that simple. Sandusky has executed very well all night long on both sides of the ball. |
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 20:29:51 GMT -5
35-21 Sandusky, 7:04 4th
|
|
|
|
Post by SportsNut on Sept 23, 2016 20:32:02 GMT -5
I would disagree with the size comment, Shelby line just as big...but Sandusky WAY more quicker
|
|
|
|
Post by streak05 on Sept 23, 2016 20:39:51 GMT -5
I would disagree with the size comment, Shelby line just as big...but Sandusky WAY more quicker Not just talking about oline. Nice to see Shelby making it interesting after I left though lol. |
|
