|
|
Post by edchambers on May 15, 2023 11:43:38 GMT -5
The NFHS (the OHSAA is a member) has made a change to Rule 4-8-1 which will eliminate the one-and-one scenario and sets new foul limits for each quarter. Teams will shoot two free throws for common fouls when team is in the bonus. Team fouls will be reset each quarter with a team in the bonus once five fouls have been committed in the quarter. This eliminates all one-and-one situations along with the seven and ten foul limits for a half.
|
|
|
|
Post by dude on May 15, 2023 12:12:06 GMT -5
Was their interest to shoot more freethrows in a game?
|
|
|
|
Post by runawaytrain on May 15, 2023 12:19:18 GMT -5
Someone probably complained that their feelings were hurt missing the front end of a 1-1 and not getting that second try
|
|
|
|
Post by usramfan on May 15, 2023 12:45:23 GMT -5
Personally, I LOVE this rule change. Hopefully, it will discourage some of the incessant fouling at the end of games.
As a scorekeeper...they will now have to re-program all the scoreboards and re-design the scorebook page.🙂
|
|
|
|
Post by litebrite on May 15, 2023 14:08:47 GMT -5
Was their interest to shoot more freethrows in a game? This actually lessens the amount of free throws. Look at NCAAM vs NCAAW basketball for some statistical comparisons. |
|
|
|
Post by dude on May 15, 2023 16:08:02 GMT -5
Was their interest to shoot more freethrows in a game? This actually lessens the amount of free throws. Look at NCAAM vs NCAAW basketball for some statistical comparisons. I would not compare NCAAM vs NCAAW to answer any question. The games are played and called very different. I suppose you could look at NCAAW before the change and since. |
|
|
|
Post by litebrite on May 16, 2023 7:07:36 GMT -5
This actually lessens the amount of free throws. Look at NCAAM vs NCAAW basketball for some statistical comparisons. I would not compare NCAAM vs NCAAW to answer any question. The games are played and called very different. I suppose you could look at NCAAW before the change and since. However you slice it, the new rules lead to less FT's. Originally, you had 16 minutes to collect 7 fouls. You could've had a rough 4 minute or so foul fest and then been stuck with all those fouls for the half. Now you have 8 minutes to collect 5 fouls, then a reset. |
|
|
|
Post by dude on May 16, 2023 9:45:26 GMT -5
I would not compare NCAAM vs NCAAW to answer any question. The games are played and called very different. I suppose you could look at NCAAW before the change and since. However you slice it, the new rules lead to less FT's. Originally, you had 16 minutes to collect 7 fouls. You could've had a rough 4 minute or so foul fest and then been stuck with all those fouls for the half. Now you have 8 minutes to collect 5 fouls, then a reset. I was thinking of it you had 2 more fouls to give before you were given a single shot. IF it was made you were given another. Now you will always be given 2 shots after the 5th foul. Some teams used to have to foul intentionally at the end of games to put teams in the 1-1. No problem either way. I actually like the change but wondered why it was made. |
|
|
|
Post by litebrite on May 16, 2023 12:30:04 GMT -5
However you slice it, the new rules lead to less FT's. Originally, you had 16 minutes to collect 7 fouls. You could've had a rough 4 minute or so foul fest and then been stuck with all those fouls for the half. Now you have 8 minutes to collect 5 fouls, then a reset. I was thinking of it you had 2 more fouls to give before you were given a single shot. IF it was made you were given another. Now you will always be given 2 shots after the 5th foul. Some teams used to have to foul intentionally at the end of games to put teams in the 1-1. No problem either way. I actually like the change but wondered why it was made. I see your point. I think we can all agree, the rule change will be interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by ronburgandy on May 16, 2023 12:41:01 GMT -5
|
|
