|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 20, 2021 11:37:19 GMT -5
Willard should Thank and send the Officials Flashes souvenirs, For their calls in that 4th quarter. The Charging call that got the Margaretta fan thrown out. A Timeout granted, After Traveling was called 1st. The Blatant throwing of the ball by Willard's #10 to the other end between possessions at the end of the game to run time off the clock, Was an Ingenious idea. However, That should have been rewarded with a Technical Foul for taking advantage of the situation, Unsportsmanlike Conduct(Cheating). The Referees, Did not put the time back on the clock, WTH ?. Congratulations Flashes, You are the Champions. Are you joking? Watch the tape moron, timeout was clearly called by Willard coach well before the traveling violation. The charging call certainly was questionable, however, if you drive to the rim outta control (forcing shots), don't expect the official to "give" you the call. You should shut up. Margaretta has very classy players. Jake is a stud, and one of the classiest kids around with his talent. The rest of your boys played a nice clean game. Wish I could say the same for your fans and coaches......they are a bit of an embarrassment. BTW, try punctuating a little more properly, your point will be better received and less embarrassing to the Margaretta school system.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 20, 2021 11:29:39 GMT -5
Willard should Thank and send the Officials Flashes souvenirs, For their calls in that 4th quarter. The Charging call that got the Margaretta fan thrown out. A Timeout granted, After Traveling was called 1st. The Blatant throwing of the ball by Willard's #10 to the other end between possessions at the end of the game to run time off the clock, Was an Ingenious idea. However, That should have been rewarded with a Technical Foul for taking advantage of the situation, Unsportsmanlike Conduct(Cheating). The Referees, Did not put the time back on the clock, WTH ?. Congratulations Flashes, You are the Champions. Are you joking? Watch the tape moron, timeout was clearly called by Willard coach well before the traveling violation. The charging call certainly was questionable, however, if you drive to the rim outta control (forcing shots), don't expect the official to "give" you the call. You should shut up. Margaretta has very classy players. Jake is a stud, and one of the classiest kids around with his talent. The rest of your boys played a nice clean game. Wish I could say the same for your fans and coaches......they are a bit of an embarrassment.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 20, 2021 11:13:12 GMT -5
For you experts why was that not a technical foul for intentionally throwing the ball down court after the last basket. First time warning second a T I believe. I don’t know why they did it to be honest, just let the clock run? This isn’t the first time Willards done something odd late w the lead after an opponents made basket. Are they told to do this or do they just black out and have a spasm?! I think you are misunderstanding the game situation, with less than 5 seconds left last nite.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 20, 2021 9:09:19 GMT -5
For you experts why was that not a technical foul for intentionally throwing the ball down court after the last basket. I believe your 1st delay of game comes with a warning. Actually, it is to the discretion of the official. Typically, a delay of game infraction is unintentional, thus the "warning" from the official. However, if the official deems the infraction to be intentional, it can certainly be called a technical foul. It should have been called a technical foul last night in Margaretta. There is alot of info out on the web about this very situation. Most officials call the technical due to "unsportman' like". Other officials say they would not blow the whistle and let the clock run out. Regardless, it is an "intentional" infraction of the rules and a technical foul is warranted in most official's opinion.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 17, 2021 9:41:57 GMT -5
would've been a close game without Paxton. Huron definitely played tough! A W is a W and an L is an L. You can’t speculate anything because had paxton not played Myles may have scored 25, who knows and who really cares, they won. Not really sure what you're trying to say. You're right, you can't speculate. Maybe Myles would've only scored 5 points if Paxton hadn't played...it's a moot point. Fact is, we're a better bssketball team when Paxton is on the court playing like he's capable. Our chances of beating Huron were greatly improved with him in the line-up. Not sure why you think otherwise.
|
|
|
Willard
Feb 13, 2021 19:38:24 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by crimson5 on Feb 13, 2021 19:38:24 GMT -5
Is it true they received over 22 appicants? I'm not sure of the 22 applicants. I do know it was whittled down to 6 candidates who got interviews. 2 of those stood out and will be reinterviewed early next week. A decision should be made by mid-week.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 13, 2021 12:40:11 GMT -5
Norwalks final 3 games are pretty tough. Perkins is very much improved team having won 7 of last 8, beat TC. SC is a pretty darn good D4 team. TC who is 17-3 If nothing it'll get them ready for the tournament. Agreed however take nothing away from the feat they can accomplish this evening winning a Lake Crown. After starting 2-5 most had them buried. Some even prior to that claiming the Lake would be TC and then everybody else (throw them in a hat) it would be a big deal to win outright but a championship is a championship. As for the tournament you know they will be ready. These seniors don’t know any different with an 8-3 record and a District title and District runner up during the past 3 seasons prior to this... In my mind, Norwalk has been the biggest surprise in all of the SBC. Kudos. I certainly had them 3rd or 4th in the Lake.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 12, 2021 20:46:56 GMT -5
Western Reserve might be playing the best of anyone in this district heading into tournaments. Just saw they smoked monroeville last nite. They are certainly the most dangerous, but inconsistent. CC most consistent.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 12, 2021 20:38:37 GMT -5
WHS 51 HHS 46 Flashes grind out a win against a Huron team that would not go away. Flashes SBC Champs as Margaretta beat Oak Harbor......Willard guaranteed atleast a share of title
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 12:17:02 GMT -5
Just for the record, and not stirring the pot, in no way, shape or form, have they overachieved! Overachieving is accomplishing more than what most (maybe even yourself) think you can. I'm certain all of these kids think the ONLY game they weren't capable of winning at the time was Tiffin Columbian. Carey, OH x 2, and Ontario (maybe) were all games that were potential wins. You know they have mentally overachieved, we can all agree on that. We knew they had the ability but what we didn't know was who could and would take over that leadership position, that is really what was in question. I think they have really overachieved in that department. I really don't think I can agree with that either. I understand why you feel that way. All of them (with maybe the exception of Myles) have played in the shadows of Parrot, Baldridge, and Devon for the past few years with very little leadership responsibilities. But, Micha, Addelman, and even Paxton had been very vocal privately about what they think they could accomplish.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 11:51:01 GMT -5
With the win Willard is now 14-5 What a fantastic prediction by crimson5 all the way back on March 4th. He was berated, hated, called names, made fun of for this prediction. He stood firm, held his ground and defended his perfect prediction. Pot stirrer. Here was the actual comment and they did over achieve. As I said, I've been wrong before. "I hope you are correct at 18-4 but this comes down to leadership and a floor general. I did not say the cupboard was bare. I like the Paxton kid's maturity this year, he is getting better but going from follower to leader isn't an easy task. I'm hoping for the best here. Optimism is 14-8 but 3 of those games may come down to outside shooting and leadership on the floor so 11-11 may be more realistic. If they hit 18-4 next year after losing 40 points per game, big time overachieving" Just for the record, and not stirring the pot, in no way, shape or form, have they overachieved! Overachieving is accomplishing more than what most (maybe even yourself) think you can. I'm certain all of these kids think the ONLY game they weren't capable of winning at the time was Tiffin Columbian. Carey, OH x 2, and Ontario (maybe) were all games that were potential wins.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 11:27:38 GMT -5
love when you guys start crying about how the refs were against you again this year like last year. Just realized jimb is a middle-school student (or that level of education), sorry for paying attention to him.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 11:02:26 GMT -5
Tough matchup for the flashes in semis. Dawson has to stop the kid with the pony tail and pink has to stop the wing they have and trey has to contain the pg. Tough but definitely doable crawford by 20 Ill take that bet right now and give you 50-1 odds. Man up!
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 11:01:12 GMT -5
Nobody can question TC's passion for Willard hoops / athletics. He's top notch. I understand his pessimism after losing 40 points per game. I had some as well. I think Joe and Hirsch have built a sustainable program that is based on the right things.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 10:50:18 GMT -5
With the win Willard is now 14-5 What a fantastic prediction by crimson5 all the way back on March 4th. He was berated, hated, called names, made fun of for this prediction. He stood firm, held his ground and defended his perfect prediction. Couldn’t agree more. What a call! Thanks for the props. We're not done yet. This team can be a Sweet 16 group. The challenges are big, but not overwhelming. Stranger things have happened.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 10:37:10 GMT -5
Guess I totally disagree with the "much trouble" part. I think both teams present lots of trouble. 😁 I hope you're wrong, but I've been wrong before too. I dont care if I'm wrong or not, I just want a W. Don't care if its by 1 or 21.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 10:26:56 GMT -5
Totally disagree with this. Huron is dangerous, even with Willard at full strength. Margaretta is equally dangerous with the Leibacher kid, and playing on their home court is huge advantage. I agree, if we play well we should win, but neither game will be easy. You can't totally disagree and then agree in the same comment :-) Willard will overpower Huron inside and will have lopsided rebounding advantage. Margaretta, Leibacher can score 20 but if they keep everyone else under 15, Willard wins that one too going away. Guess I totally disagree with the "much trouble" part. I think both teams present lots of trouble. 😁
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 10:13:36 GMT -5
1 non-conference game remaining against Northwestern.....decent D2 school that probably has some good athletes.....but looking at their record and competition it should be a W for the Flashes. Northwestern is a smaller D3 school. Thx for the correction, but thought they were D2
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 10:11:57 GMT -5
1 non-conference game remaining against Northwestern.....decent D2 school that probably has some good athletes.....but looking at their record and competition it should be a W for the Flashes. Don't see Huron as much trouble if flashes are back to full strength. Margaretta will be tough but Willard should beat them as well. I think their next real tough game will be against CC in District Semis. Totally disagree with this. Huron is dangerous, even with Willard at full strength. Margaretta is equally dangerous with the Leibacher kid, and playing on their home court is huge advantage. I agree, if we play well we should win, but neither game will be easy.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 9:54:58 GMT -5
Just know Willard won by 30 something, watched some of it on the web. Game looked pretty pedestrian, as you might expect on a cold Tuesday night against a team that is certainly rebuilding. Willard was down 1 starter (PG), and he is questionable for Friday's game against Huron. [ That sucks. Huron playing better now. Willard needs him healthy to finish off the season with a share of the sbc bay and a district title. Pulling for the flashes. Two tough ones ahead in Huron and marg. Do they have any quality non conference games remaining? 1 non-conference game remaining against Northwestern.....decent D2 school that probably has some good athletes.....but looking at their record and competition it should be a W for the Flashes.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 10, 2021 9:10:43 GMT -5
Any stats from last night? Just know Willard won by 30 something, watched some of it on the web. Game looked pretty pedestrian, as you might expect on a cold Tuesday night against a team that is certainly rebuilding. Willard was down 1 starter (PG), and he is questionable for Friday's game against Huron.
|
|
|
Willard
Feb 8, 2021 18:39:50 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by crimson5 on Feb 8, 2021 18:39:50 GMT -5
As a parent of a freshman on this year's team I am hoping for the best. Last year was tough for everyone. There is some talent walking the halls we just need to get them to go out. Does anyone (Administration) take the time to ask the kids what they think? Of course not, that would make too much sense. Getting input from as many stakeholders as possible is always beneficial. I know this first hand... 1. Several key players are on the fence about playing next season (starting QB, best wide out in the league, another starting wide out) 2. Why? Because they are tired of getting humiliated on Friday night. 3. Practice during the week is a joke, no structure, no focus, no plan to improve. My son has asked my opinion several times. My advice has been first, have no regrets when you graduate. Second, what personal goals do you want to accomplish in football, and other sports. What goals are most important to you. How will playing football impact you achieving the goals that are most important to you. Lastly, again have no regrets when you graduate. The biggest downside in his mind of playing football is the inability to compete as a team. He says we are so far behind the other teams in our league that its not fun. Why play if you're not enjoying it.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 7, 2021 17:30:31 GMT -5
They figure that they don't defend the 3-point line well when a team has multiple 3 point shooters and they figure WR has more 3-points shooters in their lineup. Figures. Which team has “more” 3 point shooters is debateable. Which team has more 3 point shooters that shoot a higher percentage i think you would be surprised. Huh? Not really debatable. WR wants to push the pace, get up shots....3 point shots, they are not bashful when letting it fly from the perimeter. CC has a couple shooters who are very good....probably higher percentage shooters as you noted. However, they are much more controlled on offense. They would prefer to run their sets and work the ball for the best shot. Dont get me wrong, CC presents big problems for Willard as well, I just think we can defend them better than WR.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 6, 2021 20:59:43 GMT -5
Yea, this a game the Flashes could easily lose if we take them lightly. If we play aggressive, share the ball, and control the pace (uptempo), I like our chances. Game in the 50s gives Lucas a shot. Game in the 40's makes Lucas hard to beat. Willard needs to push the pace, Lucas will be patient. Filmore and TC called this correctly. Lucas is very patient on offense and has some good shooters. Pinkston was a man amongst boys in the paint and that was a big difference. When the pace of the game picked up Willard would pull ahead by 8-10, then Lucas would slow it down and tie it up. Good game for both teams and agree with BK, both teams got a little better tonight.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 6, 2021 16:29:06 GMT -5
Yea, this a game the Flashes could easily lose if we take them lightly. If we play aggressive, share the ball, and control the pace (uptempo), I like our chances. What does share the ball mean? We all know their success is in up-tempo and aggressive defense. You seeing something that could be better in sharing the ball? No, I dont see any real selfish players on this team. Just think we are at our best when we have 3 or 4 guys in double figures scoring.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 6, 2021 9:35:50 GMT -5
Flashes get Lucas at home. Lucas coming in winning 9 of 10,, the loss being Ontario. D4 school that has been pretty tough last few years. Should be interesting to see how this game goes. Yea, this a game the Flashes could easily lose if we take them lightly. If we play aggressive, share the ball, and control the pace (uptempo), I like our chances.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 5, 2021 23:35:31 GMT -5
Norwalk beats Sandusky by 18 to stay atop the Lake closing in on a another title... Norwalk is a scary team right now. Playing well.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 4, 2021 10:13:11 GMT -5
Shelby will host Tiffin Calvert on Friday. I think this game will be much closer than most expect. Calvert has a bunch of scappers with talent. I won't be surprised to see Calvert win this.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 4, 2021 1:04:50 GMT -5
I don't know about matchups with CC being favorable, they have a couple of good bigs starting at 6-6 and 6-5. I kinda thought lack of size inside was Willard's Achilles heel. Walker is tough match for anyone. Plays with a lot of energy and a chip on his shoulder always. Watched them beat ridgedale twice this season. I didn't mean to imply that CC doesn't present Willard with match up problems. I agree, Walker is a load. He was last year with a 6'7" kid guarding him. I like our perimeter match ups better with CC. Studor is probably the best true point guard in the area. His basketball IQ is off the charts. He penetrates very well and can score / hit the open jumper when needed. Valentine is coming in to his own this year. A real scoring threat from the perimeter and can also penetrate, also a very versatile defender. At 6'2" / 6'3" he is a match up problem for most teams. I think Willard has someone who can slow him down. Regardless, whether its CC, WR, or OH...Willard will have to play one of its best games to compete. I think we will be up to the challenge.
|
|
|
Post by crimson5 on Feb 2, 2021 8:22:30 GMT -5
WR plays at SC on Friday. Good test to see where WR is at. OH for some reason seems to have WHS number last couple years. Why is that C5? Bad matchup for us? Looking at Willard's 5 losses, there is one common theme our opponents did......shot the 3 really well. Carey, OH twice, Ontario and Tiffin to some extent. I think we struggle guarding teams that have multiple good perimeter players. Both CC and WR are very good teams.....as well as OH, but WR scares me the most with weapons on the perimeter. Of the 3 teams, I think we match up better with CC. That doesn't mean I think we will beat them, just means I think our chances are better......cause of match ups.
|
|