|
Post by runshoot on Aug 14, 2016 14:31:42 GMT -5
My old neighbor played football at University of Penn. Mark VanMeter grad in 1994 from Huron. All Ohio helped team to state finals runner up in 1993.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2016 7:11:02 GMT -5
Emerson Lowe Donte McClure Russell Demarco Joey Brenner All four are receiving looks and interest from various FCS, D2 and Ivy League program's. To do some clarifying. Emerson- D2 and FCS Donte McClure- FCS and Ivy Joey Brenner- Ivy Russell Demarco- D2 Russel Demarco will also be playing in the blue-gray all star game this January in Florida. They are all skilled guys right? Like I said PC should be looking at a very successful year and go fairly deep in the playoffs with that much talent at the skilled position. Again I am completely going off of your word. I guess my point to all this is, if PC has that many skilled recruits and they don't have the success this year I have listed, either kids aren't as good as stated, coach messed up, some really crazy turnovers in key situations took place. I think this is a fair analysis and realistic expectations for a team with 4 skilled college recruits, anyone disagree? Remember PC spreads that ball out, they can get away with having a very mediocre OL if that is their point of weakness.
|
|
|
Post by ohsnonline on Aug 18, 2016 11:02:35 GMT -5
After some serious thought and talking to a few people at different schools, this is how I see the SBC shaping up.
Bay
1. Clyde 2. Port Clinton 3. Perkins 4. Edison 5. Oak Harbor 6. Huron 7. Vermilion
|
|
|
Post by ohsnonline on Aug 18, 2016 20:39:57 GMT -5
After watching Perkins tonight at Ross, I'm going to drop them down to #4 or #5 spot.
Sure, it's a scrimmage and maybe they had players out, but I didn't see anything from a kicking game, offense struggled with snaps, passing and running might be their strength but if a team has a solid defensive approach they'll be stoppable.
Fremont isn't very big and I think they'd lose to Clyde/PC type teams and in doing some of those side by side team comparisons, I think Perkins is going to struggle.
Hope I'm wrong.
|
|
|
Post by outsider on Aug 19, 2016 10:26:44 GMT -5
After some serious thought and talking to a few people at different schools, this is how I see the SBC shaping up. Bay 1. Clyde 2. Port Clinton 3. Perkins 4. Edison 5. Oak Harbor 6. Huron 7. Vermilion 1. Clyde 2. Port Clinton 3. Edison 4. Perkins 5. Huron 6. Oak Harbor 7. Vermilion Heard that Perkins is down this year. Oak Harbor will be worse than they were last year. They lost 18 seniors and only have 10 this year. Both offensive and defensive lines have to be completely rebuilt.
|
|
|
Post by ohsnonline on Aug 19, 2016 10:32:39 GMT -5
outsider - I don't think Oak Harbor will be worse. They return 3 year starting quarterback, have Jaret Parker healthy, the run game looks ready to go and they have young talent as well. Don't rule out those young kids.
Will they have a better record? Maybe not, but I think they'll be okay.
I think they beat Fostoria, toss-up with Eastwood, and I'll give the edge to Genoa as those kids are a year older and have some talent. So 2-1 entering week 4.
Then, I think they win 4 SBC games (SJCC, Huron, Perkins, Vermilion). That should make them around 6-4 overall.
Then, you NEVER can rule out a win against PC no matter how much better PC is going in.
|
|
|
Post by outsider on Aug 19, 2016 12:17:09 GMT -5
All very valid points OHSN. Should be an interesting year.
|
|
|
Post by runshoot on Aug 19, 2016 15:13:45 GMT -5
outsider - I don't think Oak Harbor will be worse. They return 3 year starting quarterback, have Jaret Parker healthy, the run game looks ready to go and they have young talent as well. Don't rule out those young kids. Will they have a better record? Maybe not, but I think they'll be okay. I think they beat Fostoria, toss-up with Eastwood, and I'll give the edge to Genoa as those kids are a year older and have some talent. So 2-1 entering week 4. Then, I think they win 4 SBC games (SJCC, Huron, Perkins, Vermilion). That should make them around 6-4 overall. Then, you NEVER can rule out a win against PC no matter how much better PC is going in. scrimmages dont answer much, but didnt oak harbor struggle against lake in their recent scrimmage?
|
|
|
Post by ohsnonline on Aug 19, 2016 19:49:40 GMT -5
Like you said, scrimmages don't answer much. Not sure how things turned out against Lake.
|
|
|
Post by Rodman on Aug 22, 2016 19:51:53 GMT -5
So is Clyde going to waste a 6'4" QB on the sidelines? Didn't see much at scrimmages
|
|
bgsu07
All Conference
Posts: 181
|
Post by bgsu07 on Aug 23, 2016 0:49:35 GMT -5
Vargo will probably get some mop up minutes, but Nicely is solid they are not going to give Vargo snaps because he is 6-4, should have stayed at Danbury.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2016 7:01:45 GMT -5
So is Clyde going to waste a 6'4" QB on the sidelines? Didn't see much at scrimmages If I remember correctly (if I am wrong please correct me) Brad Smith was a back up until the starter got hurt, Brad's junior year. I have never seen this kid play, know nothing about him, and really don't like to specifically talk about high school players until they are done with the senior playing season (after November its okay). I would imagine if this 6'4 kid is any kind of athlete they will find a place for him to get some snaps (WR).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2016 7:04:50 GMT -5
scrimmages dont answer much, but didnt oak harbor struggle against lake in their recent scrimmage? You can typically get a decent idea of o and d lines in scrimmages and if a team tackles and run to the ball well. There are somethings you can take away from a scrimmage.
|
|
|
Post by Rodman on Aug 23, 2016 11:13:47 GMT -5
Vargo will probably get some mop up minutes, but Nicely is solid they are not going to give Vargo snaps because he is 6-4, should have stayed at Danbury. I wouldn't go that far ! Cant really compare Apples to Oranges when you don't know the background.
|
|
|
Post by kritz on Aug 23, 2016 11:18:41 GMT -5
With his size they could play him on defense..
|
|
|
2016 SBC
Aug 23, 2016 18:10:56 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by scottyv on Aug 23, 2016 18:10:56 GMT -5
Vargo will probably get some mop up minutes, but Nicely is solid they are not going to give Vargo snaps because he is 6-4, should have stayed at Danbury. It's Nicely's job. Vargo may see limited time and then mop up duty unless Nicely gets hurt. Too many politics involved for any chance of Vargo taking the job. Clyde will rely on their talented running backs to carry the offense and sprinkle in some pass plays. You won't see a potent passing game this year, especially without a Rieman or Wiseman type receiver in the offense that can just go get a ball. Their D should be very stingy and will again be the heart of the team.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2016 8:17:30 GMT -5
Vargo will probably get some mop up minutes, but Nicely is solid they are not going to give Vargo snaps because he is 6-4, should have stayed at Danbury. It's Nicely's job. Vargo may see limited time and then mop up duty unless Nicely gets hurt. Too many politics involved for any chance of Vargo taking the job. Clyde will rely on their talented running backs to carry the offense and sprinkle in some pass plays. You won't see a potent passing game this year, especially without a Rieman or Wiseman type receiver in the offense that can just go get a ball. Their D should be very stingy and will again be the heart of the team. Basically took all my assumptions and sort of confirmed what I thought. I know this is a gossip forum, but this is why I love and hate high school football,, Big Ben didn't start till his senior at Qb, not saying this kid is even close to that or deserves to start or anything, I just get the FEELING that there is some controversy behind this QB situation. I would like to have been a fly on the wall and know the truth of situation.
|
|
|
Post by galion on Aug 24, 2016 13:19:14 GMT -5
Didn't Nicely start last season? If so what did he do wrong to lose the job?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2016 14:16:31 GMT -5
Didn't Nicely start last season? If so what did he do wrong to lose the job? I think so, I don't really follow Clyde that close to know, I probably took the conversation a little to far with my previous comment and should of left it alone, I have heard different RUMORS about the qb situation. Us continuing the conversation isn't going to get us anywhere.
|
|
tchldad
All Conference
North Coast's 100th member
formerly OL- Stepdad
Posts: 171
|
2016 SBC
Aug 24, 2016 18:31:45 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by tchldad on Aug 24, 2016 18:31:45 GMT -5
Nicely did start last year, and starting running this offense his freshman year. I'm pretty sure he knows the offense better than Vargo. And knowing Carter, he's playing the guy that's best for the team. I really don't know Vargo at all. But if he's as athletic as many have said, he'll play somewhere. Sounds like they're looking for another receiver to throw the ball up to. Could be him. I believe Logan winke probably is the guy though.
|
|
|
2016 SBC
Aug 24, 2016 20:54:50 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by scottyv on Aug 24, 2016 20:54:50 GMT -5
Nicely did start last year, and starting running this offense his freshman year. I'm pretty sure he knows the offense better than Vargo. And knowing Carter, he's playing the guy that's best for the team. I really don't know Vargo at all. But if he's as athletic as many have said, he'll play somewhere. Sounds like they're looking for another receiver to throw the ball up to. Could be him. I believe Logan winke probably is the guy though. You sure about being pretty sure?? First of all, the offense is very easy. The coaches make it difficult for D coordinators because they do such a great job calling the plays. So it isn't a matter of knowing the offense better. I'll just leave that alone. Vargo isn't switching to receiver. They have several talented receivers already. Nicely could've been a very good receiver had he made that switch a couple years ago with his speed, athleticism, and jumping abilities. That's not the case. This year will be about being able to hit the guy that's open or throw him open. As good as the receivers are on the field now, they're not a Riemen or Wiseman. You can see a whole lot more watching film than you can watching a game or reading a paper. The coaches are well aware of this. That, and the running backs that Clyde has, will dictate their offensive game plans all season.
|
|
|
Post by areafan1 on Aug 24, 2016 21:35:09 GMT -5
outsider - I don't think Oak Harbor will be worse. They return 3 year starting quarterback, have Jaret Parker healthy, the run game looks ready to go and they have young talent as well. Don't rule out those young kids. Will they have a better record? Maybe not, but I think they'll be okay. I think they beat Fostoria, toss-up with Eastwood, and I'll give the edge to Genoa as those kids are a year older and have some talent. So 2-1 entering week 4. Then, I think they win 4 SBC games (SJCC, Huron, Perkins, Vermilion). That should make them around 6-4 overall. Then, you NEVER can rule out a win against PC no matter how much better PC is going in. Your comment that OH is a toss up with Eastwood, but you give Genoa the edge is not good. Eastwood is picked to win the NBC and Genoa is 3rd or 4th. I saw Eastwood with Clyde and they scored 3-4 times.
|
|
|
Post by areafan1 on Aug 24, 2016 21:38:55 GMT -5
So is Clyde going to waste a 6'4" QB on the sidelines? Didn't see much at scrimmages Just because your 6'4" doesn't make you good. Clyde has the right person at QB. Also he doesn't want to/won't play anything else.
|
|
|
2016 SBC
Aug 24, 2016 21:45:44 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by scottyv on Aug 24, 2016 21:45:44 GMT -5
So is Clyde going to waste a 6'4" QB on the sidelines? Didn't see much at scrimmages Just because your 6'4" doesn't make you good. Clyde has the right person at QB. Also he doesn't want to/won't play anything else. This is true. He was/is determined to play QB and QB only. His only shot of playing ball at the next level was to move positions and probably to defensive end. He could've made for a very good tight end, but he's in the wrong offense for that. For the good of the team and his future, he should've switched to D end this season. He was given poor guidance leaving Danbury and encouraged by Clyde coaches to enroll in Clyde.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2016 9:08:38 GMT -5
Just because your 6'4" doesn't make you good. Clyde has the right person at QB. Also he doesn't want to/won't play anything else. This is true. He was/is determined to play QB and QB only. His only shot of playing ball at the next level was to move positions and probably to defensive end. He could've made for a very good tight end, but he's in the wrong offense for that. For the good of the team and his future, he should've switched to D end this season. He was given poor guidance leaving Danbury and encouraged by Clyde coaches to enroll in Clyde. After the season and there is nothing to talk about football wise ill have a great topic to discuss that this own situation would fall under. Right now its the start of the season and plenty of other current things to talk about.
|
|
tchldad
All Conference
North Coast's 100th member
formerly OL- Stepdad
Posts: 171
|
2016 SBC
Aug 25, 2016 12:30:59 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by tchldad on Aug 25, 2016 12:30:59 GMT -5
Just because your 6'4" doesn't make you good. Clyde has the right person at QB. Also he doesn't want to/won't play anything else. This is true. He was/is determined to play QB and QB only. His only shot of playing ball at the next level was to move positions and probably to defensive end. He could've made for a very good tight end, but he's in the wrong offense for that. For the good of the team and his future, he should've switched to D end this season. He was given poor guidance leaving Danbury and encouraged by Clyde coaches to enroll in Clyde. sounds to me that he's being selfish. They have a QB, and he could be used elsewhere. Maybe he should think more about the team, than just his case for 'playing at the next level'
|
|
|
Post by Rodman on Aug 25, 2016 13:07:22 GMT -5
Sounds to me you have a inside scoop
|
|
tchldad
All Conference
North Coast's 100th member
formerly OL- Stepdad
Posts: 171
|
2016 SBC
Aug 25, 2016 14:01:03 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by tchldad on Aug 25, 2016 14:01:03 GMT -5
Sounds to me you have a inside scoop I have no dog in this
|
|
|
Post by scout15 on Aug 25, 2016 14:39:35 GMT -5
Went through two pages and now I'm asking myself why I signed back up for this
|
|
|
Post by BellevueBuckeye on Aug 25, 2016 17:36:43 GMT -5
Went through two pages and now I'm asking myself why I signed back up for this Ha. Glad to see you found us.
|
|