|
Post by fbfan on Aug 19, 2020 11:40:44 GMT -5
LOLOL...I don't trust any politician that speaks in generalities and doesn't supply specifics, until they're dragged out of him. My information comes directly from a highly regarded physician on the front line of treating this virus AND with significant success. Not from a politician, not from the internet. To me, your information is a generality from an anonymous internet poster, attributed to an anonymous source. The news report I posted is from a national news source (Fox), with specific accounts of what some people are being charged for China Virus treatment, and the name and quote was attributed to a nationally known person (a U.S. Senator). Don't lecture me about the validity of information.
|
|
|
Post by fbfan on Aug 19, 2020 12:59:48 GMT -5
I agree with that statement. Much of what’s happening with this situation smells bad. I’m not a black helicopter guy, but a lot of available information is fishy. Antivirals are getting more positive attention and guess what has a patent and costs a lot more money than hydroxychloroquine? I could go on and on about things I’ve read and listened to that don’t add up. This situation never should have been politicized. Everyone is on the same team for this one. Team life v team death. There have been glimmers of that with research data sharing, but very little. Mostly I see media whores that just want screen time. I have a friend who is head of emergency at a hospital in a major city. He told me this yesterday. Mortality rates are down 65% even though cases are up. Due to finding the right treatments. Increased use of steroids, remdesvir, better fluid management, aggressive anti-coagulation, convalescent plasma treatments and just overall experience in treating Covid patients. It's not as simple as using one malaria drug. From another Fox News report: Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was planning to release an emergency use authorization (EUA) for blood plasma as a treatment against COVID-19. But the authorization is now on pause after top experts, namely Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins, reportedly stepped in saying the evidence was not strong enough to do so at this time, according to a new report. Dr. H. Clifford Lane, deputy clinical director at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, said the authorization was put "on hold for now" while more data is under review. However, emergency approval is still possible; Lane noted that it "could still be issued in the near future," according to the report from The New York Times.
Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, and Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, reportedly urged FDA officials to “hold off” on the authorization, pointing to new data on plasma transfusions from the Mayo Clinic. The study found that convalescent plasma with higher antibody levels transfused to hospitalized COVID-19 patients “significantly reduced mortality” as compared to transfused plasma with low antibody levels. However, Fauci and Collins reportedly believe the study lacks strong enough data to justify an emergency use authorization.Opps, there goes one of your information source's inexpensive China Virus treatments. The Fauci has spoken! I think Trump mentioned plasma treatment the other day when talking about the promising treatments his administration was supporting. Notice any similarities with any other treatment that Trump promoted?
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Aug 19, 2020 22:39:56 GMT -5
LOLOL...I don't trust any politician that speaks in generalities and doesn't supply specifics, until they're dragged out of him. My information comes directly from a highly regarded physician on the front line of treating this virus AND with significant success. Not from a politician, not from the internet. To me, your information is a generality from an anonymous internet poster, attributed to an anonymous source. The news report I posted is from a national news source (Fox), with specific accounts of what some people are being charged for China Virus treatment, and the name and quote was attributed to a nationally known person (a U.S. Senator). Don't lecture me about the validity of information. Do not blow smoke up my ars. You think I made up shat about the reduction in deaths and the specific treatments used to save lives?? I am not a doctor. That kind of information could ONLY come from the head of emergency. Now you're calling me a liar. GO AWAY! You are not respected, you are a joke!
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Aug 19, 2020 22:43:31 GMT -5
I have a friend who is head of emergency at a hospital in a major city. He told me this yesterday. Mortality rates are down 65% even though cases are up. Due to finding the right treatments. Increased use of steroids, remdesvir, better fluid management, aggressive anti-coagulation, convalescent plasma treatments and just overall experience in treating Covid patients. It's not as simple as using one malaria drug. From another Fox News report: Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was planning to release an emergency use authorization (EUA) for blood plasma as a treatment against COVID-19. But the authorization is now on pause after top experts, namely Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins, reportedly stepped in saying the evidence was not strong enough to do so at this time, according to a new report. Dr. H. Clifford Lane, deputy clinical director at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, said the authorization was put "on hold for now" while more data is under review. However, emergency approval is still possible; Lane noted that it "could still be issued in the near future," according to the report from The New York Times.
Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, and Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, reportedly urged FDA officials to “hold off” on the authorization, pointing to new data on plasma transfusions from the Mayo Clinic. The study found that convalescent plasma with higher antibody levels transfused to hospitalized COVID-19 patients “significantly reduced mortality” as compared to transfused plasma with low antibody levels. However, Fauci and Collins reportedly believe the study lacks strong enough data to justify an emergency use authorization.Opps, there goes one of your information source's inexpensive China Virus treatments. The Fauci has spoken! I think Trump mentioned plasma treatment the other day when talking about the promising treatments his administration was supporting. Notice any similarities with any other treatment that Trump promoted? All you have is an "Opps"[sic]?? Further exposing your ignorance.
|
|
|
Post by fbfan on Aug 20, 2020 6:36:43 GMT -5
To me, your information is a generality from an anonymous internet poster, attributed to an anonymous source. The news report I posted is from a national news source (Fox), with specific accounts of what some people are being charged for China Virus treatment, and the name and quote was attributed to a nationally known person (a U.S. Senator). Don't lecture me about the validity of information. Do not blow smoke up my ars. You think I made up shat about the reduction in deaths and the specific treatments used to save lives?? I am not a doctor. That kind of information could ONLY come from the head of emergency. Now you're calling me a liar. GO AWAY! You are not respected, you are a joke! Do you really think that kind information is some kind of a secret in the medical community that you were let in on by your friend? The joke is on you. Trump gives statistics and touts the progress made in fighting the China Virus every day in his news conferences, just to mention only ONE of the many places you can find it. I spoke the truth about your information from my perspective as a reader of this internet forum. Point out where I called you a liar. Sure, I'll go away since you have nothing left to offer but insults. I'll go away as the WINNER of this debate!!! Thanks for playin'.
|
|