|
Post by utsherman on Aug 30, 2018 9:04:52 GMT -5
River Valley Mount Vernon Shelby West Holmes Wadsworth Senior
Ashland
Central Perrysburg Bedford UA Clay Southview Piqua
Whitmer
94 points
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 24, 2018 20:38:02 GMT -5
Defending DIV champ, Steubenville, loses home opener to Penn Hills (PA), 21-14.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 24, 2018 8:59:44 GMT -5
Mount Vernon Clear Fork River Valley Galion Ontario Pleasant North Union Delaware Hayes
Coldwater Liberty-Benton
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 24, 2018 8:41:13 GMT -5
Shelby Ashland Lexington Mount Vernon Triway Wooster Mansfield
Lima Senior Whitmer St. Johns St. Francis Findlay Clay Springfield Central
Total Points: 124
|
|
|
OCC 2018
Aug 23, 2018 20:30:09 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by utsherman on Aug 23, 2018 20:30:09 GMT -5
Shelby 48 Madison 8, Final.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 23, 2018 20:29:16 GMT -5
Shelby 48 Madison 8, Final.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 23, 2018 19:22:00 GMT -5
Shelby 35 Madison 0, at the half. Could be much worse.
|
|
|
OCC 2018
Aug 23, 2018 19:08:03 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by utsherman on Aug 23, 2018 19:08:03 GMT -5
Shelby clocking Madison, 35-0. Close to the half.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 23, 2018 18:40:41 GMT -5
Shelby 21 Madison 0, still Q1. Schwemley is a beast.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 23, 2018 18:26:57 GMT -5
Shelby 14 Madison 0 - 7 minutes & change, Q1.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 16, 2018 9:29:53 GMT -5
Seneca East
Bellevue Mansfield Sr. Huron Sandusky Firelands Oak Harbor Stritch South Central
Calvert
Tiebreaker: 62
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 14, 2018 15:40:08 GMT -5
I don't know that I have an accurate gauge on how mobile he is. I'm not sure an appropriate sample-size is available as yet, or at least from what I've seen. Someone closer to practices or his development from previous years might provide a better answer. I know he had some sneaky-good runs in his few starts last year. And hopefully the O-line play will afford him some time to sling the ball to his playmakers. We've been spoiled with Armstrong's improvisational brilliance over the last couple years, so I don't expect to see anything close to that for who knows how long.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 14, 2018 12:57:07 GMT -5
MucMurphy's twitter account has changed. He no longer has pictures of Courtney pinned to tweets. The back ground picture is no longer the ill-advised Meyer rally of 200 people. His bio-line, referencing Urban, which said, "Who makes up stories like this?", is gone. Could it be because of the latest Jeff Snook interview with Courtney's mother? McMuphy's "news' is looking more "fake" with each passing day. Shouldn't McMurphy have tried to interview Coutney's mother first, like Snook did? Nah. This is more likely based upon the announcement of his new job with Stadium earlier today as a "College Football Insider".
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Aug 14, 2018 10:47:19 GMT -5
Shelby had a 3-Team Scrimmage with Olmstead Falls and Perkins this past week. I wasn't there in person, and only saw highlights, so can't confirm 'winners' and scoring. They got off to a slow start, but finished strong and competed. I also know they scrimmaged some D5/D6 teams last Tuesday, so this was a step up to D2/D3. They have new starters all over the place to be fair, but have some strides to make within the secondary especially. Their O-line was solid and preformed well, which is probably the strength of the team. The offense was able to maintain drives running their very base-level stuff. If was nice to see the execution, although still very vanilla, e.g. inside zone, stretch, simple passing concepts, etc. Several intermediate to long pass TD's and runs as well. Shelby is still built around being a very physical team, and will be interesting to see how they progress. McGwire Albert is up to 6'5/200 at QB, and Owen Fisher has a chance to be special in the backfield as well. But I'll be keeping my eyes on Uriah Schwemley. That kid is a pure athlete and will be all over the field. I'm sure they'll have a target on their back, but a giant chip on their shoulder as well.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Jul 20, 2018 13:39:06 GMT -5
I wasn't there, so I can't accurately relay the overall competition. As it was a 7 on 7 passing scrimmage, I'm not sure how much can be gleaned from it. I know some of these teams may end up being run first, and may have been a bit exposed. In addition, I think several teams haven't really installed plays as yet this early on. That was what Cam Todd said, as he did suit up to run the offense for Sr. at times, although still having to sit out the first five games. Locally, Hillsdale, Lexington and Mapleton were there as well. In regard to Canal Fulton Northwest, not sure why they weren't on the schedule, but they did participate.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Jul 19, 2018 8:37:05 GMT -5
Not sure how Mansfield did, but Shelby won the 16 team championship. Hounds beat Massillon Jackson, Canton Hoover, Mansfield Sr., Northwest & Waverly.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on May 17, 2018 8:32:24 GMT -5
If you're setting a new record in an event, that needs to be looked at as well. If you score 40 points lets say and someone else scored 20, but sets one or two records in those 20 points, yeah I am picking the kid who set the record. I remember the twins from Shelby, those boys could fly if it was 300M and further. Well that and the 110M Hurdles. I still remember watching them surpass us at the 2004 State Finals to take the crown. Ah, yes. The Wechter boys were ridiculous. Austin led Shelby to back-to-back state championships. He captured state titles in the 110M & 300M, in addition to the 4x400. At the time, he set the DII standard for the 300M at 36.69 and owned the DII State Meet record time of 36.83. Not sure if these still stand anymore. Went on to have a very successful indoor/outdoor track career at Notre Dame.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on May 14, 2018 10:11:53 GMT -5
James Robinson. You're welcome.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on May 10, 2018 8:59:57 GMT -5
In my opinion, with Haskins at QB, we'll finally see more of Kevin Wilson's offense from Indiana/Oklahoma. With Barrett at QB, this wasn't the optimal system to run. I think we'll see less of the read option comparatively, and finally be able to stretch the field vertically - with a ridiculous threat in the backfield with Dobbins/Weber & Co. I also think Urban will have a package for Martell inside the 10 yard line, or goal to go situations.
As far as Burrow is concerned, I wish him the best. I know he was a beast in High School, and was a loyal 'soldier' as Urban called him, with ridiculous work ethic and toughness to match. I think it will be interesting however, to see where he lands. If he wasn't guaranteed to start at OSU, what assurances will the coach have to provide at his new school? He could end up back in the same position as he was in at OSU, especially if wants to play at a high-end Power 5 school. I know that there aren't currently all-world QB's at Florida, LSU, Nebraska, UCLA, etc., but how could they possibly guarantee anything for a dude whose stat line essentially equates to one full college football game?
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Mar 8, 2018 10:20:41 GMT -5
Quote from Zach Ruth at Northmor "It’s kind of like a country version against and intercity version on Tuesday night. We are going to show that we can play,” said Ruth. Final was Africentric 68 and Northmor 49. Africentic had 5 Moochies to Northmor's one. I heard Northmor's had 2 points in the 1st half. I'm shuddering to ask what you even mean here? What's a 'Moochie'? Are you referring to Meechie Johnson?
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Mar 2, 2018 21:32:17 GMT -5
Seems as if Bucknuts has now retracted the original article on Dante Booker’s potential transfer. I had seen this reported on several sites this afternoon, most notably from Alex Gleitman of 24/7 Sports.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Mar 2, 2018 19:21:00 GMT -5
Vermilion 53 Shelby 47 Final
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Mar 2, 2018 18:40:43 GMT -5
Vermilion 26 Shelby 23 Half
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Mar 2, 2018 15:53:54 GMT -5
Sounds like most people (on this thread) have been on the firing end of an AR-15. Fortunately, I'm guessing most haven't been on the receiving end. That tends to change perspective, in my opinion. I don't care what you do with your guns. Shoot all the ground hogs you want. But don't tell me that someone is coming to confiscate them. No offense, but that's such a tired line. I thought Obama was coming to get them? You know it's actually the current POTUS who just said, during a nationally televised Congressional meeting no less, that we should suspend due process and take your guns away before you're tried. That's no Leftist conspiracy or DEM secret-strategy. That's the MAGA guy talking all by himself - to the horror of his $30 million dollar backers (NRA) and most with an 'R' next to their name. I think Dana Loesch stop live-tweeting the event at that point because she lost consciousness.
In the meantime, please report back when they come knocking to take them. I won't hold my breath.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Mar 2, 2018 15:17:07 GMT -5
Per reports, Dante Booker is expected to transfer after graduating this Spring. After losing Jerome Baker and Chris Worley to the NFL Draft, they'll now have to replace 3 former starting LB's. Time for the younger guys like Borland, Harrison, Browning, Jones and Hilliard to step up. Let's hope Bill Davis can get that room under control, because that group was more than a bit underwhelming this past season. Best of luck to Booker!
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Feb 28, 2018 15:24:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Willard
Feb 26, 2018 15:38:05 GMT -5
Post by utsherman on Feb 26, 2018 15:38:05 GMT -5
A couple lol! But the O.G./Elida game was packed. The Carey/Upper game ×2 were sellouts. Wauseon/Archbold big crowd both games Cardinal Stritch/Cornerstone Christian 50/50 was $985 on not quite a sellout. Those are some examples of good sized crowds in decent sized gyms. How many does Carey's gym hold? The main gymnasium seats roughly 1,220.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Feb 26, 2018 14:23:32 GMT -5
There seems to be a pretty big divide between both sides that are looking for a solution. One side seems to think that arming teachers provides a deterrent while also providing the ability to respond to shooters. The issue is centered on protecting our schools, arming the good people, and preventing people who should not have guns from getting them and using them. The other side thinks banning the firearms will remove the mass killing ability of the shooter. The school shooter issue is really seen as a greater gun violence issue. Not only do they think that arming teachers is ineffective, they also believe this will fail to prevent shootings in Vegas, but really gun violence in general. I both sides need to discuss this at a different angle if they are ever going to reach a consensus on this. The question that should be asked Gun advocates: What would it take for you to support repealing the 2nd Amendment?If someone isn't going to ever stop supporting the 2nd Amendment, they are never going to support legislation that inhibits it. This is the NRA's entire reason for existence. They and their supporters believe that owning arms is a god given right and it is part of their American identity and makeup. Do you have a problem with gun violence in America? The NRA is going to say it's a people issue, not a gun issue. My individual right to bear arms should not be inhibited when there are obviously 2 ways to prevent shootings. Stop "bad" individuals from getting guns and kill "bad" individuals when they do. They think they can solve the shooter problem individually, through mental health screenings, background checks, and acting on warning signals for individuals. Others think we arm the populace and just address the "inevitable" shooting case by case. Gun advocates are using motivated reasoning to defend guns because it is integral to who they are as a person and what they think America should be about. I don't think people like sportsjock are going to be convinced about any gun-related solution because it's literally not an option for them. For people like galion, they think guns are the problem, because in his mind gun=lethal violence. They see a correlation between gun violence and the number of guns in a country and think that they can address it collectively. They look at charts like this: and this and this and they think that getting rid of guns will reduce gun violence. The correlation works right? It makes sense due to statistics. If they believe this is true, then they are going to do the same motivated reasoning as gun advocates. They are going to ignore that there may be countries with both many guns per person and lower gun deaths because the solution is so clear and easy to them. Something needs to be done to reframe this debate and find a solution for this gun violence once and for all. We know that neither side will cave to the other so let's try to agree on some easy things. 1. We all think the United States has a gun violence issue. Whether it is a people problem or a gun problem, it doesn't matter. We can agree it's an issue. 2. We can all agree that school shootings are part of that greater gun violence issue. It is a bad/crazy/misled person with a gun that seeks to murder someone, whether it be a rival gang member, a school child, or even themselves. 3. If we agree on the above 2, we can start looking at case studies that have a high level of guns and low violence. You guys are literally just arguing your perceptions on how asinine hypotheticals would play out in when teachers have concealed carry and you both literally have no hard evidence of whether it works or not. Yes, many schools are adopting cc carrying teachers, but let us also remember that it was widely used policy to take fluoride out of the water to combat communism brainwashing. Yes, there are arguments that can be made that it is unpractical but you literally don't have enough knowledge in human psychology to be able to prove how people will react to every shooting incident. Anyways, it is getting us nowhere and you guys aren't going to reach a solution anytime soon. If you guys could use some EVIDENCE and talk about a solution that takes into account to each other's biases, that would be great. Looking at case studies from countries that lowered gun violence without banning guns entirely would be nice. If you guys can't do that, these discussions aren't going anywhere and you guys can save your time and go back to arguing about high school sports. I don't think there will ever be consensus on this issue. And of course no 'one-size-fits-all' approach. You're also straddling the line between school safety and the broader issue of general gun violence. It's difficult to narrow the focus to any one specific study, or evidence, as you request. In reference to gun violence, most will point to Australia's comprehensive gun control initiative. That model would never work here. As mentioned in a New York Times Op-Ed, " Australians have a profoundly different relationship with weapons. Americans love guns. We're scared of them." Our respective histories' are different where it regards the role of firearms. They never had a revolution, or fought foreign troops on their soil. No civil war. So when it became time to confiscate 650,000 privately owned firearms, ban semiautomatic weapons, initiate twenty-eight-day waiting periods, provide a genuine reason to qualify for a license (self-protection doesn't count), and a national gun registry, Australians, on the whole, were happy to accept said new restrictions. Could you imagine the madness if that were proposed here? And depending whether you watch Fox News, MSNBC or listen to NPR, you'll find a study to suit your particular viewpoint, right? Without continuing to bloviate, I'll share the following as an interesting read: www.vox.com/2016/2/29/11120184/gun-control-study-international-evidenceIn reference to issues regarding school safety, I prefer placing a laser-focus on prevention (response) versus reaction. As an example, the Sandy Hook Promise initiative is a solid model. I'll post the link (below) so people can look if interested. They essentially work to build coalescence between parents, schools, and community organizations to deliver gun violence prevention programs and mobilization for the passage of sensible state and national policy. At this point, there are schools statewide in Ohio that do participate in this program already - at no cost. Again, this is important to me because it can be implemented right now. We don't have to wait for funding, intense debate that goes nowhere, or for our elected officials to get off their... well, you know what. www.sandyhookpromise.org/And for those of you who want to provide me the worst case-scenario situation, or blow holes (figuratively) in my perspective, I hear you. And that's why I've asked some of these 'asinine hypotheticals', as heresjim calls them, in my previous posts to advocates for CC in schools. I'm just a parent who's looking to listen to all voices. Even if I don't agree with them all.
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Feb 23, 2018 21:35:33 GMT -5
Shelby 52 Perkins 51 F
|
|
|
Post by utsherman on Feb 23, 2018 20:33:39 GMT -5
Norwalk 29 Bellevue 23 3rd Q
|
|