|
|
Post by Big Lex Fan on Apr 26, 2016 2:14:47 GMT -5
Ashland and Wooster top of the league?
Will Lexington continue to improve.
Will Clear Fork and West Homes get out of the cellar?
Any Thoughts?...
|
|
|
|
Post by averagejoe on May 3, 2016 7:03:30 GMT -5
I looks like the voters feel Wooster is the best bet for league title. My guess is Ashland could be right there. Lexington may improve but may not have a better record. If West Holmes struggles, lock for the coach to be run out. Clear Fork will struggle but they will blame it on the OCC and look forward to the MOAC where they will get beat also.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2016 16:39:00 GMT -5
Wooster should have the kids to win this league every season. This year may show that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ramsfan09 on May 21, 2016 22:17:21 GMT -5
I read on another site that a rb is leaving wooster. I'm not sure who the rb is but they said he's headed to Massillon
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on May 25, 2016 16:26:18 GMT -5
Wooster should have the kids to win this league every season. This year may show that. "Have the kids" is part of the equation. What school has the best head coach, the best staff, the best program? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2016 5:18:46 GMT -5
Every coach wins with talent. If you were not so quick to argue you could have understood my post. Wooster has the kids to win the league every season. They may not have the coaching but they have the kids.
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on May 26, 2016 15:11:18 GMT -5
You are getting more and more paranoid as get older. There is no plausible explanation for how my post is arguing. YOU can't have it both ways, even though you try incessantly. You make a post and you call it a "thought". Others make a post and you call it arguing. Now THAT IS an argumentative position.
That's a pretty bold statement to say Wooster has the kids to win a Championship "every year". EVERY YEAR??? I can't think of one school anywhere that wins their football League Championship EVERY YEAR. Why does Wooster have the kids "every year"? It can't be because they're the largest school in the OCC. The scooter doctrine says you DO NOT have to be the biggest school to win League Championships.
99% would take my post as looking deeper into the query. We all know one "wins with talent". But it takes more than "have the kids" to win Championships. You can't just trot "kids" out there every Friday night and win a Championship. There are other factors that go into winning Championships. I have heard you say that many times. But I'm not allowed to have the same "thought" that you've had in the past. You call it arguing when I say it. Just looking for a DISCUSSION on the other ingredients that go into winning a high school football League Championship. We're talking.....Championships!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2016 15:21:43 GMT -5
I never said that should win it every year. What I said was they have the kids to win. The school has a lot of athletes every year walking it's halls. There is no need for you to argue this as it is my thought, my opinion and not a fact. Many schools can have championship talent on occasion which comes from special players or maybe a special class or group but few have athletes like that all the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on May 29, 2016 19:02:58 GMT -5
Show us where it was MY thought that Wooster "should win it every year." All I have to do is quote your crazy thought. "Wooster has the kids to win the league EVERY season". RIGHT THERE, you said it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2016 7:22:32 GMT -5
You are looking for an argument again. I never said you said anything and I thought I clearly stated it was my thought, try reading again. If you knew the athletes Wooster has walking the halls and playing other sports you may see what I am saying.
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on May 30, 2016 22:39:50 GMT -5
Saying I'm arguing is just plain silly and untruthful. All I'm doing is pointing out where you talk out of both sides of your mouth at the same time. You said, "Wooster has the kids to win the league EVERY season." Then you say you didn't say that, when we all can see that you DID say it. Then you say what you said was, "Wooster has the kids to win." Those are two COMPLETELY different statements. You think you can just say anything your heart desires and get away with it. One of those statements MUST be being untruthful, which one??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2016 6:35:37 GMT -5
The Bengals have the talent to win the Super Bowl. Not saying they should win. The OKC Thunder have the talent to win the NBA Finals, nor saying they should win it. Wooster yearly has the athletes to win the OCC, not saying they should win it every year. I'm trying to be clear but you keep trying to make it cloudy. It's a simple statement.
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on May 31, 2016 21:35:37 GMT -5
I will not let you get away with this. You can try and try and try to get the last word in and it will not matter. The Bill, Hillary AND scooter strategy. Repeat the falsehood enough times and you numb the minds of most, wear them down and it becomes believed. That won't happen here.
You said, "Wooster has the kids to win the league EVERY year."
Then you deny that you said it, even though we can all see you DID say it.
Then you say THIS is what you said, "they have the kids to win."
6-4 is winning, but WILL NOT "win the league EVERY year".
Two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT statements. Which is the truth and which is the falsehood to CYA??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2016 7:51:15 GMT -5
I will not let you get away with this. You can try and try and try to get the last word in and it will not matter. The Bill, Hillary AND scooter strategy. Repeat the falsehood enough times and you numb the minds of most, wear them down and it becomes believed. That won't happen here. You said, "Wooster has the kids to win the league EVERY year." Then you deny that you said it, even though we can all see you DID say it. Then you say THIS is what you said, "they have the kids to win." 6-4 is winning, but WILL NOT "win the league EVERY year". Two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT statements. Which is the truth and which is the falsehood to CYA?? Wooster has the kids to win the league every year. - true, I said it and I believe it. They have the kids to win. - true, I said it and I believe it. 6-4 will not win the league. - true, I never said it would. Im not sure what you are arguing? |
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Jun 1, 2016 19:30:08 GMT -5
My persistence has payed off. You finally admit to making contradicting statements.
You made a ridiculous statement when you said, "Wooster has the kids to win the league EVERY year." NO ONE wins their league EVERY year.
I called you on it. THUS you changed your tune to, "Wooster has the kids to win". A much more realistic statement, not your typical exaggerations.
"Wooster has the kids to win" = a 6-4 record. For Wooster to be assured to "win the league EVERY year", they better not lose more than ONE game EVERY year. The ridiculous part.
The reason you are not sure why I'm arguing is because I AM NOT arguing. Just pointing out your typical ridiculous statements, which you changed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2016 21:47:01 GMT -5
I never changed. I believe they have the athletes and I said it, and I still say it. It would be ridiculous to say a school will win every league title. I however said that Wooster has the kid, athletes, players, students to win every year. I did not make a prediction on any seasons outcome. If you cannot simply understand what is being written, please do not try to make such a dramatic statement out of it.
I believe that Wooster every season has the athletes to win the OCC title. Not saying they will. Not predicting their record.
|
|
|
|
Post by umbrella0326 on Jun 2, 2016 14:53:36 GMT -5
This is off topic, but I love the way this website shows poll results.
It's really cool and very clear.
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Jun 2, 2016 18:39:58 GMT -5
I never changed. I believe they have the athletes and I said it, and I still say it. It would be ridiculous to say a school will win every league title. I however said that Wooster has the kid, athletes, players, students to win every year. I did not make a prediction on any seasons outcome. If you cannot simply understand what is being written, please do not try to make such a dramatic statement out of it. I believe that Wooster every season has the athletes to win the OCC title. Not saying they will. Not predicting their record. ANOTHER change! "Believe" is a new verb you just added. Trying even more to lessen the ridiculousness of your statement, "Wooster has the kids to win the league EVERY year. If "Wooster has the kids to win the league EVERY year", then SURELY Senior has the kids to win the league most years. Ashland has the kids to win the league most years. Madison has the kids to win the league most years. NEVER EVER say anyone has the kids to win the league EVERY YEAR. A complete misnomer. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2016 19:22:55 GMT -5
OMG, WTF? I could never imagine someone being this way. If I made the statement "Ontario has the athletes to win the NOL girls soccer title every year" Would I be speaking for anyone other than myself? Wouldn't that make the statement my BELIEF? If I said Wooster Public Schools has 1 high school that is a fact and not a belief, but if a say they have the athletes to win something, that is my belief even if the word believe is not stated directly.
Have your last word but I stand by my statement as I know the district and their athletes well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ramsfan09 on Jun 3, 2016 18:57:16 GMT -5
Can we talk about who will finish where instead of arguing
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Jun 3, 2016 19:19:27 GMT -5
Wooster should have the kids to win this league every season. This year may show that. "Have the kids" is part of the equation. What school has the best head coach, the best staff, the best program? As can be seen above, that was exactly what I wanted to do. But scooty had to hijack the thread and turn it into a verbal altercation......per usual. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2016 19:41:43 GMT -5
HAH!
Hudson, Go back and see who started it by quoting someone's post. I only posted my thoughts. The kids are always the reason for winning seasons.
My guess at this time in June would be this,
Wooster, Ashland,
Madison, Mansfield, Lexington
West Holmes, Clear Fork
|
|
|
|
Post by Ramsfan09 on Jun 4, 2016 22:21:07 GMT -5
My predictions:
1. Wooster- has loads of talent coming back . Did hear that a rib may have left the school.
2. Madison- returns a lot of talent . However they will need to build a oline and Dline .
3. Ashland- has a qb and receiver coming back. Not sure what else they have but they are usually pretty good.
4. Lexington- has a lot coming back . I'm just not sure they have what it takes to move up in the league.
5. Mansfield- has very good athletes . They don't have a oline though. They're also braking in a new qb
6. Clearfork- couple good players but just not a very good team overall
7. West Holmes- might be a game better then last year
|
|
|
|
Post by Willard Fillmore on Jun 5, 2016 15:09:45 GMT -5
HAH! Hudson, Go back and see who started it by quoting someone's post. I only posted my thoughts. The kids are always the reason for winning seasons. My guess at this time in June would be this, Wooster, Ashland, Madison, Mansfield, Lexington West Holmes, Clear Fork HA,HA,HA  Scooty quotes someone and he's posting his thoughts, everyone quoting him his arguing. He thinks his thoughts are above reproach Should we revisit the Willard coaches thread and look at all scooty's quotes of others telling them how wrong they are?? HA,HA,HA. Does Ashland return their QB? If so, the others will have to prove they can beat the best coach in the league. Just my thought, if I'm allowed to have one. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2016 15:44:16 GMT -5
I have never thought or felt I was above anyone else. I was only pointing out who started the debate.
And yes, I have done it many times. but not this time.
Ashland QB is returning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2016 15:50:59 GMT -5
Hudson, why do you put Madison so high if you feel they need improvement with both the O and D lines? I'll grant you they return a talented player but as we saw last season he can be held in check and the graduated a bunch. I'm curious as I know you are a ram fan(and maybe a UK fan soon)
|
|
|
|
Post by Ramsfan09 on Jun 10, 2016 19:55:07 GMT -5
I talked to a coach from Madison that's said the oline will not be the biggest but should be solid. Madison usually haves a decent oline. Madison should at least finish top 4
|
|
|
|
Post by Ramsfan09 on Jun 10, 2016 19:57:35 GMT -5
I really just believe in my team. I also believe there tough and have the capability to finish 1st if they play well. I'm not happy we are playing Toledo st francis
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2016 8:02:21 GMT -5
Believing in your team is good but most fans believe in their teams and it doesn't get wins. I think they can finish top 4 as well but top 1 or 2 may be tough but if they get some help many things are possible. On paper I feel they are 3rd but as we know OCC upsets happen each year. Should be a competetive season for a few at the top.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2016 10:29:51 GMT -5
A few people associated with the Lexington program have the idea that any where between 8-2 and 10-0 is possible.
|
|
